Phenomenon of the implementation of legal liability for an offense (unlawful behavior) and actual problems associated with its understanding are investigated. The place of the problems of the implementation of legal liability in the structure of the general theory of legal liability is characterized. The dual «objective-subjective» nature of the realization of legal liability through its main incarnations at the level of objective and subjective law is determined. The definition of the implementation of legal liability for unlawful behavior is formulated, its purpose and legal means of implementation are named. The stages and main forms of the general theoretical model for the implementation of legal liability are considered. The debatable problems of the theory of the implementation of legal liability are thoroughly presented and analyzed from the point of view of their formulation and the author’s approach. In order to ensure the principles of comprehensiveness, objectivity and completeness of the research in addition to general methods, also involved private law methods (formal legal, structural legal, comparative legal and legal modeling), which made it possible to compare and establish the features of interaction between various legal phenomena and processes, involved in the implementation of liability. As sources uses the provisions of the current domestic and foreign legislation, acts of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation also doctrinal works on topics, including foreign ones. The novelty of the study is the presentation of a comprehensive vision of the specifics and problems of the implementation of legal liability, which have methodological significance for the legal science. The conclusion about the need to form a common understanding of the legal liability system and its conceptualization in industry and applied legal research, and to adapt the process of implementing liability taking into account the development of digital technologies.

Kuzmin Igor Aleksandrovich - Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Chair of Administrative and Financial Law, Law Institute, Irkutsk State University (1, K. Marx st., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation), e-mail: grafik-87@mail.ru

Kuz'min I.A. Realizaciya yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti za pravonarushenie [Relization of legal liability for the offense]. Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2020, no 2 (89), pp. 16–23. (in Russian).

340.1

1. Bajtin M.I. Sushchnost prava (Sovremennoe normativnoe pravoponimanie na grani dvuh vekov). 2nd, ed. Moscow, Pravo i gosudarstvo Publ., 2005, 544 p. (in Russian)

2. Bychkova T.S. Obespechenie prav cheloveka kak prioritetnoe napravlenie funkcion-irovaniya grazhdanskogo obshchestva v mekhanizme realizacii yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti. Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo institute, 2008, no. 1, pp. 102-105. (in Russian)

3. Komarov S.A. Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava : uchebnik dlya bakalavriata i magistratury. 9th ed. Moscow, YUrajt Publ., 2018, 506 p. (in Russian)

4. Kuz'min I.A. Gosudarstvenno-prinuditel'naya forma realizacii yuridicheskoj otvetstven-nosti. YUrist VUZa, 2015, no. 5-6, pp. 67-74. (in Russian)

5. Kuz'min I. A. Dobrovolnaya forma realizacii yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti. Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik, 2011, no. 4, pp. 10-16. (in Russian)

6. Kuz'min I.A. Metodologicheskie orientiry v obshcheteoreticheskih issledovaniyah yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti. ZHurnal rossijskogo prava, 2018, no. 7, pp. 62-72. (in Russian)

7. Lipinskij D.A., Hachaturov R.L., SHishkin A.G. Mery yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti : monogr. Moscow, RIOR, INFRA-M Publ., 2014, 231 p. (in Russian)

8. Lipinskij D. A., Musatkina A. A. YUridicheskaya otvetstvennost', sankcii i mery zashchity : monogr. Moscow, RIOR: INFRA-M, 2013, 139 p. (in Russian)

9. Luk'yanova E.G. Teoriya processual'nogo prava. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2003, 240 p. (in Russian)

10. Markin A.V. Formy realizacii yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti. Vektor nauki TGU, 2009, no. 6, pp. 68-74. (in Russian)

11. Miroshnichenko A.G. YUridicheskaya otvetstvennost glavy municipalnogo obrazovaniya: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya i realizacii. Filosofiya prava, 2009, no. 5, pp. 75-78. (in Rus-sian)

12. Popondopulo V.F. Dinamika obyazatel'stvennogo pravootnosheniya i grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost'. Vladivostok, Dalnevost. Univ. Publ., 1985, 112 p. (in Russian)

13. P'yanov N.A. Aktual'nye problemy teorii gosudarstva i prava : ucheb. posobie. 2nd ed. Irkutsk, Irkutsk State Uiversitet Publ., 2011, 255 p. (in Russian)

14. Samoshchenko I.S., Farukshin I.S. Otvetstvennost po sovetskomu zakonodatel'stvu. Mos-cow, YUrid. lit. Publ., 1971, 240 p. (in Russian)

15. Samusevich A.G. Rassledovanie pravonarushenij: teoriya processa. Irkutsk, IrGTU Publ., 2014, 172 p. (in Russian)

16. Sorokin V.V. YUridicheskaya otvetstvennost': duhovno-nravstvennyj podhod : monogr. Moscow, YUrlitinform, 2018, 160 p. (in Russian)

17. Spasovich V.D. Izbrannye trudy i rechi. comp. I. V. Potapchuk. Tula, Avtograf Publ., 2000, 496 p. (in Russian)

18. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava : uchebnik. eds. V.M. Korelskij, V.D Perevalov. Moscow, Norma-INFRA-M Publ., 1997, 560 p. (in Russian)

19. Hasnutdinov R. R. Metodologiya sistemnogo podhoda k yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti : monogr. Samara, Samara State Institut FSIN of Russia Publ., 2014, 172 p. (in Russian)

20. YUridicheskaya otvetstvennost: doktrinalnyj slovar. Eds. A.V. Malko, D.A. Lipinskij. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2020, 208 p. (in Russian)

21. Gogin A.A. et al. YUridicheskaya otvetstvennost': istoriya i sovremennost. Ed. by D.A. Lipinskij. Tolyatti, TGU Publ., 2014, 268 p. (in Russian)

22. YAvich L.S. Pravo i socializm. Moscow, YUrid. lit. Publ., 1982, 176 p. (in Russian)

23. Kingston J.K. C. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Liability. Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXXIII: Incorporating Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XXIV. Eds. M. Bramer, M. Petridis. London, Springer Publ., 2011, pp. 269-279. (in English)