SIBERIAN LAW HERALD
ISSN 2071-8136 (print)
ISSN 2071-8144 (online)

List of issues > Siberian Law Herald 2020.

Thesises of the delivering thing (continuation). About the delivering bar-gain’s causalness

Author(s)
Rovniy Valeriy Vladimirovich
Abstract
The article continues a series of articles about the delivering thing (traditio). It is dedicated to the question of causalness the delivering thing as a disposal bargain. A number of general and special conclusions is made. There are a few ones among them:a) in the Civil Law of RF admission of the principle distinguishing (bargains into two parts obligatory and disposal) doesn’t connect with the other known principle abstractness, inherent to some foreign states’ right and doesn’t mean automatic recognition the disposal bargains’ abstract character; b) of two principles distinguishing and abstractness the primary principle is the principle of distinguishing, the secondary one is the principle of abstractness; c) the problem of delivering bargain’s causalness or abstractness has it’s deep historical roots and is solved differently in the contemporary legislation of different states;the feature of bargain’s abstractness is always the exception from the general rule of the bargain’s causalness, which in this way should come out of the law, so in the conditions the lack of sufficient and legal based proves of the bargain’s abstractness, this bargain must be recognised as the causal one; e) delivering bargain’s causalness in the conditions the lack of the quality of it’s ground the obligatory bargain’s (it’s imperfection or invalidity) allows to return the thing back as itself (so called in nature) to the alienator, on the contrary, the delivering bargain’s abstractness in similar conditions allows to the alienator to get money-compensation; consequently, the idea of the delivering bargain’s causalness is profitable for the alienator, while the idea of it’s abstractness for the acquirer (promotes the dinamics of public relations and civil circulation’s stability). The attempts of some authors to prove the abstract character of delivering thing by the reference to the acting law (for instance, the attempt to get the feature of bargain’s abstractness from the fact, that the law doesn’t mention the bargain’s ground as the necessary condition of it’s validity, and also to prove the delivering bargain’s abstractness by the reference to the rule of art. 1106 Civil Code) are refuted and categorically rejected. The commentary of the art. 1106 Civil Code’s rule is offered. Finally there are two examples, when the subject’s defect of the obligatory bargain falls off by the monent of it’s fulfilment, so the practical meaning of the delivering bargain’s causalness is illustrated.
About the Authors
Rovniy Valeriy Vladimirovich - Doctor of Juridical Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Civil Law, Law Institute, Irkutsk State University (1, K. Marx st., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation), e-mail: civil@lawinstitut.ru
For citation
Rovnyj V.V. Tezisy o peredache veshchi (prodolzhenie). O kauzal'nosti sdelki-peredachb [Thesises of the delivering thing (continuation). About the delivering bar-gain’s causalness]. Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2020, no 2 (89), pp. 42–49. (in Russian).
Keywords
obligatory bargain, disposal bargain, delivering thing bargain, causalness, abstractness, causal bargain, abstract bargain
UDC
347.232:347.133.9
References

1. Vake A. Priobretenie prava sobstvennosti pokupatelem v silu pro-stogo soglasheniya ili lish vsledstvie peredachi veshchi? O raskhozhdenii putej recepcii i ego vozmozhnom preodolenii. Civilis-ticheskie issledovaniya. Vypusk pervyj : sb. nauch. tr. pamyati professora I.V. Fedorova. Eds. B. L. Haskelberg, D. O. Tuzov. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2004, pp. 133-147.

2. Varul P.A. Rasporyaditelnye sdelki. Sbornik nauchnyh statej v chest' 60-letiya E.A. Krash-eninnikova. Ed. P. A. Varul. Yaroslavl, YAroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Publ., 2011, pp. 34-42.

3. Vasilev G. S. Perekhod prava sobstvennosti na dvizhimye veshchi po dogovoru : Abstr. Dis. Sci. Saint-Petersburg, 2006, 20 p. (in Russian)

4. Vlasova A.V. Abstraktnye obyazatelstvennye dogovory. Ocherki po torgovomu pravu. Ed. by E.A. Krasheninnikov. Yaroslavl, YAroslavl State Univ. Publ., 2002. Iss. 9, pp. 9-19.

5. Grachev V.V. Pravovaya priroda tradicii./ Sbornik statej k 55-letiyu E.A. Krasheninnikova. Ed. by P.A. Varul. Yaroslavl, YAroslavl State Univ. Publ., 2006, pp. 16-35. (in Russian)

6. Digesty YUstiniana. Ed. by Kofanov L.L. Vol. 3, book XII–XIX. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2003, 780 p. (in Russian)

7. Digesty YUstiniana / Ed. by Kofanov L.L. Vol. 6, polutom 2, book XLI–XLIV. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2005, 564 p. (in Russian)

8. Dozhdev D.V. Rimskoe chastnoe pravo : uchebnik dlya vuzov. Moscow, Infra-M-Norma Publ., 1996, 704 p. (in Russian)

9. Ioffe O.S. Obyazatelstvennoe pravo. Moscow, YUridicheskaya literature Publ., 1975, 880 p. (in Russian)

10. Ioffe O. S. Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe pravo. Obshchaya chast'. Pravo sob-stvennosti. Obshchee uchenie ob obyazatel'stvah : kurs lekcij. Leningrad : Izdatel'stvo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1958. 511 p.

11. Kniper R. Zakon i istoriya (o sostoyanii i izmeneniyah Germanskogo Grazhdanskogo Ulozheniya). Eds. SH. As'yanov, L. SHatberashvili. Almaty, Nomos Publ. (g. Baden-Baden), 2005, 278 p. (in Russian)

12. Avilov G.E. et al. Kommentarij k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii, chasti vtoroj (postatejnyj). Ed. by O.N. Sadikov. 2nd ed. Moscow, Kontrakt Publ., Infra-M-Norma Publ., 1997, 800 p. (in Russian)

13. Krasheninnikov E.A. Sdelki, nuzhdayushchiesya v soglasii. Ocherki po torgovomu pravu. Ed. by E. A. Krasheninnikov. YAroslavl, YAroslavl State Univ. Publ., 2008, iss. 15, pp. 5-18. (in Rus-sian)

14. Kultyshev S.B. Rasporyazhenie trebovaniyami posredstvom ustupki. Abstr. Diss. Sci. Tomsk, 2006, 25 p. (in Russian)

15. Kultyshev S. B. Rasporyazhenie trebovaniyami posredstvom ustupki: voprosy teorii i praktiki : monografiya. Vladivostok, Dalnevostochnii Univ. Publ., 2009, 180 p. (in Russian)

16. Novickij I. B. Obshchee uchenie ob obyazatel'stve. Moscow, Gosyurizdat Publ., 1950, 416 p. (in Russian)

17. Novickij I.B. Sdelki. Iskovaya davnost. Moscow, Gosyurizdat Publ., 1954, 247 p.

18. Pavlov A.A. Perevod dolga.vOcherki po torgovomu pravu : sb. nauch. tr. ; red. E. A. Krash-eninnikov. YAroslavl, YAroslavl State Univ. Publ., 2007, iss. 14, pp. 51-62. (in Russian)

19. Tuzov D.O. O pravovoj prirode tradicii. Sbornik statej k 55-letiyu E. A. Krasheninnikova. Ed. by P. A. Varul. YAroslavl, YAroslavl State Univ. Publ., 2006, pp. 57-84. (in Russian)

20. Haskelberg B.L., Rovnyj V.V. Individualnoe i rodovoe v grazhdanskom prave : monografiya. 2nd ed. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2004, 236 p. (in Russian)

21. Haskelberg B.L. K voprosu o pravovoj prirode tradicii. Sbor-nik statej k 55-letiyu E.A. Krash-eninnikova. Ed. by P. A. Varul. YAroslavl, YAroslavl State Univ. Publ., 200, pp. 120-136.

22. Haskelberg B.L., Rovnyj V.V. Konsensualnye i real'nye dogovory v grazhdan-skom prave. 2nd ed. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2004, 124 p. (in Russian)

23. Hvostov V. M. Sistema rimskogo prava. Moscow, Spark Publ., 1996, 522 p. (in Russian)


Full text (russian)