The article is dedicated to the bargain part’s invalidity. The author’s point of view concerning comprehension and application the article 180 Civil Code of Russian Federation (further - CC) is formulated. The following questions - a) the sense and meaning of the rule art. 180 CC; b) the role of the objective and subjective criterions in recognition the bargain as invalid in the part; c) the phenomenon of the bargain’s part and varieties of the parts for the art. 180 CC’s application; d) the defects causing the recognition invalidity bargain in the part; e) the essence of the supposition about the importance or unimportance the defect bargain’s part in the art. 180 CC; f ) the applicability the rules of the bargain’s invalidity (§ 2 ch. 9 CC) for the invalid bargains in the part - are being investigating in detail. In the connection with recognition the bargain as invalid in the part a number of disputable and problematic moments is being discussing. They are: a) the comprehension of the objective and subjective criterions, the meaning of the objective criterion in unilateral bargains, faithful manipulation by the subjective criterion; b) the separability the part from the bargain and the problem of the defectiveness of the bargains’ essential conditions; c) the problem of formal and subjects’ defects in the connection with the recognition the bargain as invalid in the part; d) the dualism of the supposition and the kind of the presumption in the art. 180 CC’ application. Side by side with the civil law’s questions some procedural questions connected with the art. 180 CC’ application are touched upon. Stabilized in the literature opinions are subjected to the critical comprehension. As the result the attempt to graund more wide capacities for the recognition bargain as invalid in the part was undertaken. The conclusions are accompanied by a plenty of examples and references to the rules of the Civil Code Russian Federation.

the bargain’s invalidity in the part, the objective criterion, the subjective criterion, the part of bargain, the defect of the bargain’s part

Rovniy Valeriy Vladimirovich – Doctor of Juridical Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Civil Law, Law Institute, Irkutsk State University (1, K. Marx st., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation), e-mail: civil@ lawinstitut.ru

Rovnyj V. V. O nedejstvitel'nosti chasti sdelki [About the Bargain Part’s Invalidity] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2021, no 1(92), pp. 38–44. DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2021.1.38. (in Russian).

347.441.832

DWEIWM

1. Kommentarij k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federatzii, chasti pervoj (postatejnij) [Commentary on the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, part one (itemized)] / red. O. N. Sadikov. Moscow, Juridicheskaja firma Kontrakt , Izdatelskij dom Infra-M, 1997. 778 p. (in Russian)

2. Kommentarij k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federatzii. Chast pervaja : ucheb.-praktich. komment. [Commentary on the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Part one: study-practical comment] / red. A. P. Sergeev. Moscow, Prospekt, 2010, 912 p. (in Russian)

3. Kommentarij k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu RSFSR [Commentary on the Civil Code of the RSFSR] / red. S. N. Bratus, O. N. Sadikov. 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. Moscow, Juridicheskaja literatura, 1982, 680 p. (in Russian)

4. Nauchno-prakticheskij kommentarij k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federatzii, chasti pervoj [Scientific and practical commentary on the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, part one] / red. V. P. Mozolin, M. N. Maleina. Moscow, Norma, 2004, 848 p. (in Russian)

5. Rovnij V. V. Posledstvija nesobljudenija formi sdelki [Consequences of non-compliance with the form of the transaction], Sibirskij juridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald], 2016, no. 2, pp. 68-77. (in Russian)