The problem of correlation of legal phenomena of legal liability and realization of law is investigated from the standpoint of interconnections, interactions and contradictions between them. The sphere of «contact» of legal liability and the realization of law, their main properties at different levels of legal reality, based on the pluralism of the established scientific approaches, has been determined. It is proposed to consider legal liability as a general theoretical and sectoral model at the macro and micro levels. The specificity of the correlation of these phenomena inof the study and possible methodological approaches to its conduct, based on existing legal knowledge, as well as taking into account the real needs of legal practice. It is concluded that it is necessary to form a general theoretical, and then a sectoral methodology for studying the processes of correlation between legal liability and the realization of law for the purposes of law-making and law enforcement.

legal liability, realization of law, interaction, contradictions, research methodology

Kuzmin Igor Aleksandrovich – Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Theory and History of State and Law, Irkutsk Law Institute (branch) University of Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation (1, Shevtsov st., Irkutsk, 664035, Russian Federation), e-mail: grafik-87@mail.ru

Kuz'min I.A. Vzaimosvyazi, vzaimodejstviya i protivorechiya yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti i realizacii prava [Relationships, Interactions and Contradictions of Legal Liability and the Exercise of Law] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2021, no 2(93), pp. 3–9. DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2021.2.3. (in Russian).

340.1

RETBVT

1. Bobrova N.A., Hachaturov R.L. Sushchnost' yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti [The essence of legal responsibility]. Theory of State and Law, 2020, no. 2, pp. 26-48. (in Russian)

2. Bondarev A.S. Rolevaya subektivnaya yuridicheskaya obyazannost' - vid i mera yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti [Role subjective legal liability as a type and extent of the legal liability]. Perm university herald. Juridical sciences. 2012, no. 2, pp. 8-17. (in Russian)

3. Duhno N.A., Ivakin V.I. Ponyatie i vidy yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti [Concept and types of legal responsibility], State and Law. 2000, no. 6, pp. 12-17. (in Russian)

4. Ivannikov A.I. Aksiologiya yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti [Axiology of legal responsibility]. Moscow, Yurlitinform, 2020, 144 p. (in Russian)

5. Ivahnenko S.N. Yuridicheskaya i social'naya otvetstvennost': problemy ponimaniya i sootnosheniya [Legal and social responsibility: problems of understanding and relationship]. Humanities and law studies. 2013, no. 1, pp. 25-29. (in Russian)

6. Kartashov VN YUridicheskaya kul’tura, antikul’tura i otvetstvennost’ [Legal culture, anticulture and liability]. Yaroslavl, Filigran, 2019, 352 p. (in Russian)

7. Kuz'min I.A. Dobrovol'naya forma realizacii yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti [Voluntary form of realization of law responsibility]. Siberian law herald, 2011, no. 4, pp. 10-16. (in Russian)

8. Kuz'min I.A. Sistemnaya model' yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti [System model of legal liability]. Irkutsk, Irkutsk Law Institute (branch) of the University of the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation, Printing house «Irkut», 2018, 186 p. (in Russian)

9. Lavrent’ev A.R. Kollizii instituta yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti v Rossii [Collisions of the Institute of Legal Responsibility in Russia]. Cand. sci. diss. abstr. Nizhny Novgorod, 1999, 26 p. (in Russian)

10. Levin G.D. Protivopolozhnosti i protivorechiya [Opposites and contradictions]. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2007, vol. XI, no. 1. pp. 37-48.

11. Mal'ko A.V., Markunin R.S. Pravovaya sistema obshchestva i yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' [The legal system of the society and legal responsibility]. Legal Science and law enforcement practice. 2020, no. 2, pp. 6-13. (in Russian)

12. Mironov V.O., Zin N.V. O yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti [About legal responsibility]. Law and State: The Theory and Practice. 2020, no. 12, pp. 69-71. (in Russian)

13. P'yanov N.A., Kazankov Ya.N. O poznanii v pravoprimenitel'noj deyatel'nosti [On cognition in law enforcement]. Prologue: Law Journal, 2014, no. 2, pp. 5-11. (in Russian)

14. P'yanov N.A. Teoriyagosudarstva iprava [Theory of State and Law]. Part. 2. Irkutsk, ISU Publishing House, 2011, 397 p. (in Russian)

15. Skinderev R.V. Ob’ektivnoe i sub’ektivnoe v prave [Objective and subjective in law]. Cand. sci. diss. abstr. Ekaterinburg, 2006, 27 p. (in Russian)

16. Chernogor N.N. Problemy otvetstvennosti v teorii municipaVnogo prava i praktike mestnogo samoupravleniya [Problems of liability in the theory of municipal law and practice of local self-government]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Publishing House «Jurisprudence», 2012, 301 p. (in Russian)

17. YUnusov A.A., Kuchenev A.V. Sovremennye problemy yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti v kontekste pravosoznaniya. Current Issues of the State and Law in the XXI century. 2018, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 122-12. (in Russian)

18. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’ vpravovoj sisteme Rossii: normativnye i pravorealizacionnye problemy vzaimosvyazej, vzaimodejstviya i protivorechij [Legal liability in the legal system of Russia: normative and legal realization problems of interconnections, interactions and contradictions], eds. A. V. Malko, D. A. Lipinsky, A. A. Musatkina. Moscow, RIOR, 2020, 658 p.