List of issues > Siberian Law Herald 2021. 3
Judge’s dissenting opinion of the Constitutional Court: characteristics of a legal institute
Author(s)
Abstract
The institute of judicial dissenting opinions in the different fields of procedure law was actively studied from 2005 to 2021 in Russia. At the same time, dissenting opinions are regulated sparsely and fragmentarily in law. A content analysis of scientific articles about dissenting opinions helped to form a relevant selection of articles about the institute of dissenting opinions. A semantic analysis of the articles showed that dissenting opinions was studying mostly in the constitutional judicial procedure. The institutional characteristics of dissenting opinions were not studied separately. It has been proved that a dissenting opinion in a constitutional court has institutional characteristics which settled in the theory of law. The regulation of this institute is a homogeneous nature, the rules are systematically arranged, interrelated, isolated in separate articles of the law. Thus, these conclusions will help to find gaps and defects in the current regulation of dissenting opinions in constitutional judicial procedure.
Keywords
institute of dissent, regulation of the right to dissent, institutional characteristics, content analysis, Semantic Analysis, manifest analysis, constitutional litigation
About the Authors
Nefedyeva Evgeniya Aleksandrovna - Postgraduate student of the Department of Constitutional, Administrative and Financial Law, Banzarov Buryat State University (6, Sukhbaatar st., Ulan-Ude, 670000, Russian Federation), e-mail: burfinans@gmail.com
Hamnuev Yuliy Grygoryevich - Сandidate of Juridical Sciences, Head of the Department of Constitutional, Administrative and Municipal Law, Banzarov Buryat State University (6, Sukhbaatar st., Ulan-Ude, 670000, Russian Federation), e-mail: hamnuev_yug@mail.ru
For citation
Nefedyeva E.A., Hamnuev Yu.G. Osoboe mnenie sud'i konstitucionnogo suda: institucional'nye harakteristiki [Dissenting opinion of a judge of the constitutional court: institutional characteristics] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2021, no 3(94), pp. 14–17. DOI 10.26516 / 2071-8136.2021.3.14. (in Russian).
UDC
342.56
EDN
ACLUFI
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26516/2071-8136.2021.3.14
References
1. Belyaeva G.S. Ponyatie i sushchnost' yuridicheskogo instituta [The definition and nature of the legal institute]. Teoriya gosudarstva iprava [Russian Journal of Theorists of State and Law], 2019, vol. 2(14), pp. 39-45. (in Russian)
2. Gavrilov E. Ob osobom mnenii sud'i [About judicial dissenting opinion]. Khozyaistvo i parvo [Business and Law], 2015, vol. 4(459), pp. 75-79. (in Russian)
3. Tai Yu.V. Osoboe mnenie sud'i [A judicial dissenting opinion]. Vest- nik grazhdanskogo protsessa [Herald of Civil Procedure], 2016, vol. 3, pp. 25-51. (in Russian)
4. Ulturgashev P.Yu. Osobye mneniya sudei v sravnitel'no-pravovom kontekste [Judicial dissenting opinions in a comparative legal context]. Srav- nitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie [Comparative Constitutional Review], 2013, vol. 6(97), pp. 75-87. (in Russian)