Parkhomenko Svetlana Valerievna ↑, Lazuk Darya Sergeevna

This research is devoted to the issue of distinction between minor acts (p. 2 of Art. 14 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) and other offenses. As an example, the author analyzes the complexity of application Art. 256 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and p. 2 of Art. 8.37 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation. During the research it becomes clear that population of the Russian Federation, including justice officials, does not perceive illegal fishing as a crime. In this regard, there are a lot of controversial issues considering ways of distinguishing an administrative offense from a criminally punishable act. Based on the results of the study, the author made an attempt to improve the legislation, specifically we propose to introduce the new concept of a “criminal offense” in order to bring the legislation in line with social and economic forces.

insignificance, minor acts, social danger, criminal liability, administrative liability, illegal fishing

Parkhomenko Svetlana Valerievna – Doctor of Juridical Sciences, Professor, Chief Researcher, Legal Studies Institute, Baikal State University (11, Lenin st., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation), ORCID: 0000-0002-0370-3102, ResearcherID: AAZ-9298-2020, e-mail: psvet@mail.ru

Lazuk Darya Sergeevna – The Head Assistant, Baikal-Angarsk Prosecutor’s Office (74, 5 Army st., Irkutsk, 664025, Russian Federation), ORCID: 0000-0002-7737-6546, ResearcherID: GZA-3299-2022, e-mail: dashalazuk@ya.ru

Parkhomenko S. V., Lazuk D. S. K voprosu o razgranichenii maloznachitel'nyh deyanij (ch. 2 st. 14 UK RF) i inyh pravonarushenij [Commenting on distinction of minor acts (part 2 art. 14 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) and other offenses] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2022, no 4(99), pp. 81 - 86. DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2022.4.81. (in Russian).

343.232

PTBIHO

1. Gerasimov A.M. Yuridicheskie posledstviya ugolovnogo prostupka [Legal consequences of a criminal offense]. Vestnik SGYUA [Bulletin SGLA], 2022, no. 1 (144), pp. 182-189. (in Russian)

2. Durkheim E. Norma i patologiya. Sociologiya prestupnosti. Sovremennye burzhuaznye teorii: Sbornik statej: Perevod s anglijskogo [Norm and pathology. Sociology of crime. Modern bourgeois theories: Collection of articles: Translation from English]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1966, pp. 39-44. (in Russian)

3. Korsun D.Yu. Obshchaya harakteristika deyanij, kotorye mogut byt’ priznany maloznachitel’nymi [General characteristics of the actions which can be considered insignificant (part 2 of art. 14 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia], 2019, no. 2, pp. 140-146. (in Russian)

4. Markuntsov S.A. O masshtabah permanentnoj novellizacii Ugolovnogo kodeksa RF [On the scale of permanent novelization of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika [Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice], 2018, no. 2, pp. 18-26. (in Russian)

5. Rogova E.V., Zabavko R.A., Ivushkina O.V. Mezhotraslevaya otvetstvennost’ differenciaciya otvetstvennosti v kontekste vvedeniya ugolovnogo prostupka [Intersectoral responsibility differentiation of responsibility in the context of the introduction of a criminal offense Inter-branch differentiation of responsibility in the context of the introduction of a criminal offense]. Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii [Vestnik of the East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia], 2022, no. 2, pp. 106-115. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mezhotraslevaya-differentsiatsiya-otvetstvennosti-v-kontekste-vvedeniya-ugolovnogo-prostupka (date of access: 05.11.2022). (in Russian)