The article deals with issues related to the analysis of quantitative and qualitative indicators of crime and their role in assessing the effectiveness of the activities of the internal affairs bodies of the Russian Federation. The issues of ensuring the effectiveness of anti-crime measures are highlighted. The analysis of the state and dynamics of crime in modern Russia and its detection is given. The problematic issues of the effectiveness of the applied norms, primarily criminal legislation, and its relationship with crime indicators are considered. An assessment of the role of latent criminal in this regard is given. Quantitative indicators of crime are studied from the position of indicating the effectiveness of the application of normative legal acts directly aimed at combating crime.

crime, latent crime, crime indicators, crime prevention, internal affairs bodies of the Russian Federation, the effectiveness of modern legislation, the effectiveness of the application of regulatory legal acts

Malykhina Tatiana Anatolievna – Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Organization of Judicial and Law Enforcement Activities, East Siberian Branch of the Russian State University of Justice (23a, Ivan Franko st., Irkutsk, 664074, Russian Federation), ORCID: 0000-0002-2350-9702, RSCI AuthorID: 736584, е-mail: malykhina_t@mail.ru

Malykhina T. A. The importance of crime indicators in assessing the activities of the internal affairs bodies of the Russian Federation [Znachenie pokazatelej prestupnosti pri ocenke deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennih del Rossijskoj Federacii] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2024, no 1(104), pp. 102–106. – DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2024.1.102 (in Russian)

343.9.018

1. Kaziev A.Z., Karaeva L.H. Slozhnosti vyyavleniya latentnoj prestupnosti [Difficulties in detecting latent crime]. Vestnik magistratury [Bulletin of the Magistracy], 2019, no. 5-5(92), pp. 69-72. (in Russian)

2. Kleimenova E.V. Latentnaya prestupnost v Rossii [Latent crime in Russia]. Evrazijskij nauchnyj zhurnal [Eurasian Scientific Journal], 2016, no. 5, pp. 240-241. (in Russian)

3. Peschanskikh G. V. Ekonomiko-matematicheskie metody ocenki effektivnosti deyatel’nosti organov vnutrennih del [Economic and mathematical methods for evaluating the effectiveness of the activities of internal affairs bodies]. Probely v rossijskom zakonodatelstve [Gaps in Russian legislation], 2010, no. 2, pp. 271-284. (in Russian)

4. Prestupnost i obshchestvo [Crime and society]. Coll. of sci. art. Eds.: A.L. Sitkovsky et al. Moscow, VNII MIA of Russia Publ., 2014, 214 p. (in Russian)

5. Borkov V.N., Bavsun M.V., Nikonovich S.L. et al. Ugolovno-pravovye, kriminologicheskie i kriminalisticheskie problemy protivodejstviya korrupcii [Criminal law, criminological and forensic problems of combating corruption]. Tambov, Publishing house Pershina R. V., 2016, 188 p. (in Russian)

6. Shalyugina E.S. K voprosu o latentnoj (skrytoj) prestupnosti [On the issue of latent (hidden) crime]. YUridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj akademii MVD Rossii [Legal science and practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia], 2010, no. 2 (13), pp. 329-331. (in Russian)