The issues arising as a result of creation of works by artificial intelligence using machine learning technologies are considered. It is determined that this problematic has a complex character and should be considered from the point of view of the existing copyright legislation, taking into account the current state of doctrine and judicial practice. It is determined that the ability to self-learning is a feature characterising artificial intelligence as a phenomenon. The process of self-learning of artificial intelligence on the basis of protected objects of copyright cannot be interpreted as a violation of copyright. It is revealed that copyright infringement as a result of generation by artificial intelligence of a new object will take place in the case of borrowing elements of the form of the protected work. It has been established that the use by artificial intelligence of common ideas and images, concepts and categories, ideas and other similar elements in the process of generating works cannot be considered a violation of copyright. It is pointed out that it is possible to protect the interests of authors of works used by artificial intelligence in the process of machine learning in the framework of protection of intangible goods. It is established that the activity of artificial intelligence on fabrication of works requires improvement of the system of intangible benefits. In particular, it is necessary to legislate the right to vote.

Bogustov Andrey Alekseevich – Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Chair of International Law, Faculty of Law, Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno (3/1, Dovatora lane, Grodno, 230112, Republic of Belarus), ORCID: 0000-0001-6557-1494, RSCI AuthorID: 532074, e-mail: bogustov_aa@grsu.by

Bogustov A. A. Avtorsko-pravovye aspekty generacii iskusstvennym intellektom ob"ektov na osnove mashinnogo obucheniya [Copyright aspects of generation of objects by artificial intelligence on the basis of machine learning] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2024, no 2(105), pp. 36–43. – DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2024.2.36 (in Russian)

347.78

1. Babakova T.A., Akinina T.M. Pedagogika i psikhologiya vysshei shkoly: metodika raboty s ponyatiinym apparatom [Pedagogy and psychology of higher school: methodology of work with the conceptual apparatus]. Petrozavodsk, PetrSU Publ., 2013, 62 p. Available at: https://didacts.ru/slovari/pedagogika-i-psihologija-vysshei-shkoly-metodika-raboty-s-ponjatiinym-apparatom-2013.html (accessed: 26 January 2024). (in Russian)

2. Bogustov A.A. K diskussii o pravosub”ektnosti iskusstvennogo intellekta [To the discussion about the legal personality of artificial intelligence]. Pravo tsifrovoi ekonomiki – 2022 : Ezhegodnik-antologiya [The Law of the Digital Economy – 2022 : Annual Anthology], Moscow, 2022, vol. 18, pp. 154-171. (in Russian)

3. Bogustov A.A. Pravovoi rezhim rezul’tatov tsifrovoi fabrikatsii [Legal regime of the results of digital fabrication]. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika [Juridical science and practice], 2022, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 48-54. DOI: 10.25205/2542-0410-2022-18-1-48-54. (in Russian)

4. Bogustov A.A. Problema rasprostraneniya avtorsko-pravovoi okhrany na ob”ekty, sozdannye iskusstvennym intellektom [The problem of the extension of copyright protection to objects created by artificial intelligence]. Pravova derzhava [Constitutional State], 2020, no. 38, pp. 64-69. DOI: 10.18524/2411-2054.2020. 38.204110. (in Russian)

5. Bulgakov D. Chuzhim umom: pochemu pisateli nedovol’ny iskusstvennym intellektom [Someone else’s mind: why writers are unhappy with artificial intelligence]. Izvestiya [News]. Available at: https://iz.ru/1627623/dmitrii-bulgakov/chuzhim-umom-pochemu-pisateli-nedovolny-iskusstvennym-intellektom (accessed: 26 January 2024). (in Russian).

6. Intellektualnaya sobstvennost: Glavy 8-13. Osnovnye materialy. V 2 ch. Chast 2 [Intellectual property. Chapters 8-15. Basic materials]. In 2 parts. Part 2. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1993, 365 p. (in Russian)

7. Liptsik D. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava [Copyright and Related Rights]. Moscow, LadomirPubl., UNESCO Publ., 2002, 788 p. (in Russian)

8. Matveev A.G., Martyanova E.Y. Grazhdansko-pravovaya okhrana golosa cheloveka pri ego sinteze i posleduyushchem ispolzovanii [Civil Protection of the Human Voice During Its Synthesis and Subsequent Use]. Ex jure, 2023, no. 3, pp. 118-131. DOI: 10.17072/2619-0648-2023-3-118-131. (in Russian)

9. Naumov V.B., Kamalova G.G. Voprosy postroeniya yuridicheskikh definitsii v sfere iskusstvennogo intellekta [Problems of the Formation of the Conceptual App a ratus in the Field of Artificial Intelligence]. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva I prava RAN [Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS], 2020, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 81-93. DOI: 10.35427/2073-4522-2020-15-1-naumov-kamalova. (in Russian)

10. Sadikova M.A., Avazova N.K. Samoobuchenie iskusstvennogo intellekta. bazovye printsipy raboty iskusstvennogo intellekta na prostom primere [Artificial intelligence self-learning. basic principles of artificial intelligence with a simple example]. Elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal “Potomki Al-Fargani ”[Descendants of Al-Farghani electronic scientific journal], 2023, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 246-250. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10338386. (in Russian)

11. Svetunkova A. Plyasat’ pod II-dudku: kak muzykanty ispol’zuyut neyroseti [Dancing to the AI tune: how musicians use neural networks]. Izvestiya [News]. Available at: https://iz.ru/1545801/alena-svetunkova/pliasat-pod-ii-dudku-kak-muzykanty-ispolzuiut-neiroseti (accessed: 26 January 2024). (in Russian).

12. Sudarikov S.A. Avtorskoe pravo [Copyright]. Textbook. Moscow, Prospect Publ., 2010, 463p. (in Russian)

13. Sudarikov S.A. Osnovy avtorskogo prava [Fundamentals of copyright law]. Minsk, AmalfeyaPubl., 2000,512p. (in Russian)

14. Tagainazarov Sh.T. Grazhdansko-pravovoe regulirovanie lichnykh neimushchestvennykh prav grazhdan v SSSR [Civil-law regulation of personal non-property rights of citizens in the USSR]. Dushanbe, Donish Publ., 1990, 216 p. (in Russian)

15. Tolstoy V.S. Lichnye neimushchestvennye pravootnosheniya [Personal non-property legal relations]. Moscow, ElitPubl., 2006, 198 p. (in Russian)