The mechanism of obtaining samples for comparative research through the production of operational investigative measures in cases of refusal to voluntarily provide them is considered. The procedural guarantees of the observance of the rights and freedoms of participants in criminal proceedings are listed, complaints of violation of which are most often found in the materials of judicial practice. Based on the arguments presented in this study, it is concluded that it is possible to obtain these samples as a result of operational investigative activities in the framework of the execution of the investigator’s instructions, and also describes the way to legalize them in the criminal procedure field.

operational-search activity, obtaining samples, investigator’s assignment, criminal procedure

Shemchuk Sofia Yurievna – Adjunct of the 1st year of study of the Faculty of Training of Scientific-pedagogical and Scientific Personnel, V. Ya. Kikoty Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia (12, Akademik Volgin st., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation), Lieutenant of Police, ORCID: 0009-0002-0208-3092, RSCI Author ID: 1091950, e-mail: sofia_shemchuk@mail.ru

Shemchuk S. Yu. Praktika ispol'zovaniya rezul'tatov operativno-razysknoj deyatel'nosti v dosudebnom proizvodstve (prinuditel'noe iz"yatie obrazcov dlya sravnitel'nogo issledovaniya) [Practice of using the results of operational and investigative activity in pre-trial proceedings (forced seizure of samples for comparative study)] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2025, no 1(108), pp. 127–131. – DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2025.1.127 (in Russian)

343.132

1. Zhbankov V. A. Poluchenie obraztsov dlya sravnitelnogo issledovaniya [Obtaining samples for comparative study]. Textbook. Moscow, Publishing house of the UMC at the GUK of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, 1992, 55 p. (in Russian)

2. Kussmaul R. Pravo na lozh i parvo na molchanie kak lementy prava na zashchitu [The right to lie and the right to silence as elements of the right to defense]. Rrossiiskaya yustitsiya [Russian Justice], 2003, no. 2, pp. 33-35. (in Russian)

3. Michurina O.V. O soblyudenii razumnogo balansa mezhdu dopustimostyu prinuzhdeniya i ego zapretom pri proizvodstve otdelnykh sledstvennykh deistvii [On observing a reasonable balance between the admissibility of coercion and its prohibition in the production of certain investigative actions]. Vestnik moskovskogo universiteta mvd rossii [Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia], 2020, no. 2, pp. 152-156. (in Russian)

4. Porosenov P.I. K voprosu vzaimodeistviya organov predvaritelnogo sledstviya i rganov osushchestvlyayushchikh operativno-rozysknuyu deyatelnost [To the issue of interaction between bodies of preliminary investigation and bodies carrying out operational and investigative activities]. Pravo i gosudarstvo teoriya i praktika [Law and State: theory and practice], 2018, no. 9, pp. 138-142. (in Russian)

5. Sumin A.A. Ispolzovanie rezultatov operativno-rozysknoi deyatelnosti v dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva aktualnye problem teorii i praktiki [The use of the results of operational-search activity in pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings: current problems of theory and practice]: Textbook. Moscow, V.Ya. Kikotya Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Publ., 2015, 80 p. (in Russian)