Discussed issues of the methodology of theoretical and legal research in the field of state and legal regulation of ethno- confessional relations. The author analyzes the provisions of the theoretical and legal doctrine related to the constructive analysis of the definitive projections of the methodology as a scientific knowledge of legal reality. The position on the relationship between the nature of state-legal regulation of ethno-confessional social relations, with the philosophical and legal perspectives of legal understanding and social and normative regulation of social relations due to the cultural and religious factor. The features of the methodology of legal regulation associated with the processes of law formation, rulemaking and law enforcement are identified. The analysis of the grounds for highlighting methodological approaches, their stratification in a wide and narrow sense is carried out. In the broad as a combination of methodological approaches, the researcher’s worldview, the system of methods of cognition developed by science, legal (and state science) concepts and categories that serve as tools for understanding the problems of state and law. In narrow as a doctrine of the principles, methods, techniques of scientific knowledge of the subject of science, the theory of the state of law. The multidisciplinarity of methodological approaches is justified, as well as the choice of elements of the methodological corps when studying manifestations of religiously determined factors in the processes of legal regulation. Scientific philosophical and worldview approaches fulfill the function of a general research strategy. The specificity of materialist dialectics is noted, when referring to its formational projection, in the process of interpreting the genesis and functioning of law and religion as socio-cultural phenomena. The features of the metaphysical approach and its specificity with respect to the study of state-legal regulation of processes having an ethno-legal nature are revealed. It is concluded that philosophical and worldview approaches - metaphysical and dialectical should be considered as meta-approaches, the basic link of scientific theoretical and legal methodology.

Arzumanov Igor Ashotovich

Doctor of Cultural Studies, Ph.D. sciences, associate professor, professor of the department of constitutional law and theory of law. Law Institute, Irkutsk State University

1, K. Marx st., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation

e-mail: arzumanov@mail.ru

Arzumanov I.A. Metodologicheskie podhody i principy poznaniya pri issledovanii gosudarstvenno-pravovogo regulirovaniya etnokonfessional'nyh otnoshenij (chast' vtoraya). Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik, 2020, no 1 (88), pp. 3–8. (in Russian)

340.2

BRRIHH

1. Bonner A.T. Princip dispozitivnosti sovetskogo grazhdanskogo processualnogo prava. Moscow, VJuZI Publ., 1987, 78 p. (in Russian)

2. Vaneeva L.A. Princip dispozitivnosti sovetskogo grazhdanskogo processualnogo prava. Voprosy razvitija i zashhity prav grazhdan. Mezhvuzovskij tematicheskij sbornik. Kalinin, Kalin. un-t Publ., 1977, рр. 98-105. (in Russian)

3. Gromov N.A., Nikolajchenko V.V., Franciforov JU.V. O dejstvii principov publichnosti i dispozitivnosti pri vozobnovlenii ugolovnyh i grazhdanskih del po vnov’ otkryvshimsja obstojatelstvam. Pravovedenie,

1999, no. 1, pp. 186-198. (in Russian)

4. Daev V.G., Marshunov M.N. Osnovy teorii prokurorskogo nadzora. Leningrad, Leningr. un-t Publ., 1990, 136 p. (in Russian)

5. Dikarev I.S. Dispozitivnost v ugolovnom processe Rossii. Volgograd, VolGU Publ., 2005, 164 p. (in Russian)

6. Elisejkin P.F. Predmet i principy sovetskogo grazhdanskogo processualnogo prava. Jaroslavl, Jaroslavl Univ. Publ., 1974, 109 p. (in Russian)

7. Katomina V.A. Spravedlivost i sostjazatelnost v rossijskom prave. Cand. sci. diss. Saratov, 2009, 210 p. (in Russian)

8. Klejnman A.F. Sovetskij grazhdanskij process. Moscow, Moscow Univ. Publ., 1954, 407 p. (in Russian)

9. Murad’jan JE.M. Sudebnoe pravo (v kontekstah treh processual’nyh kodeksov). Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2003, 128 p. (in Russian)

10. Treushnikova M.K., Cheshki Z. (eds.). Osnovnye principy sovetskogo grazhdanskogo processa. Moscow, Moscow Univ. Publ., 1991, 144 p. (in Russian)

11. Petruhin I.L. Teoreticheskie osnovy reformy ugolovnogo processa v Rossii. Moscow, TK Velbi Publ., 2004, vol. 1, 220 p. (in Russian)

12. Pleshanov A.G. Dispozitivnoe nachalo v sfere grazhdanskoj jurisdikcii: problemy teorii i praktiki. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2002, 352 p. (in Russian)

13. Poljakov I.N. Princip dispozitivnosti v dejatelnosti sudebnyh obshhestvennyh jurisdikcionnyh organov, rassmatrivajushhih grazhdanskie dela. Cand. sci. diss. abstr. Moscow, 1977, 20 p. (in Russian)

14. Poljanskaja N.Ju. Realizacija principa dispozitivnosti v mehanizme grazhdansko-processual’nogo regulirovanija. Cand. sci. diss. abstr. Saratov, 2005, 22 p. (in Russian)

15. Ponomarenko S.S. Dispozitivnye nachala v rossijskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Cand. sci. diss. abstr. Orenburg, 2002, 22 p. (in Russian)

16. Radchenko V. Sudebnuju vlast – v centr pravovoj reform. Rossijskaja justicija, 1999, no. 10, pp. 2-4. (in Russian)

17. Smirnov V.P. Razdelenie osnovnyh funkcij i ravnopravie storon. Pravovedenie, 1999, no. 3, pp. 171-178. (in Russian)

18. Gurvich M.A. (ed.). Sovetskij grazhdanskij process. Moscow, Vyssh. Shkola Publ., 1967, 436 p. (in Russian)

19. Strogovich M.S. Ugolovnyj process. Moscow, Jurid. izd-vo MJu SSSR Publ., 1946, 511 p. (in Russian)

20. Sumachev A.V. Dispozitivnost v ugolovnom prave. Juridicheskaja nauka i pravoohranitel’naja praktika, 2008, no. 1(4), pp. 66-79. (in Russian)

21. Savickij V.M., Larin A.M. Ugolovnyj process: slovar’-spravochnik. Moscow, Kontrakt: Infra-M Publ., 1999, 270 p. (in Russian)

22. Shananin A.A. Princip dispozitivnosti grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava. Cand. sci. diss. abstr. Saratov, 1999, 20 p. (in Russian)

23. Jakub M.L. Demokraticheskie osnovy sovetskogo ugolovnoprocessualnogo prava. Moscow, Moscow Univ. Publ., 1960, 171 p. (in Russian)