The modern direction of the development of the modern science of civil law is determined - the legal regulation of the fulfillment of obligations automatically without a physical presence, in legal science there is a need to understand the legal basis of this execution and the legal means that can be applied to it. The question is asked about the use of the concept of the debtor’s previously expressed consent for the performance of an obligation. In this article, the author aims to describe the mechanism of automated fulfillment of obligations using the design of the debtor’s previously expressed consent, the significance of the actions of the debtor in such execution, as well as the possibility of improper performance of the obligation in such execution. The author offers a pre-expressed consent to fulfill the obligation to define as consent, which is given through the performance of specific actions by the party to the obligation and expresses the intention of this party to give rise to legally significant consequences in the form of actions to fulfill the obligation. It is determined that a party gives pre-expressed consent using electronic means, and this consent is not entitled to change or cancel. The author concludes that the category of pre-expressed consent should be used to describe the automated fulfillment of obligations in electronic commerce.

previously expressed consent, performance of obligations, previously expressed consent on performance of obligations, automated performance of obligations, smart contract

Elizaveta V. Zainutdinova

Assistant, Department of Business Law, Civil and Arbitration Proceedings, Novosibirsk National Research State University,

1 Pirogova St., 630090, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

e-mail: zainutdinovaev@gmail.com

Previously Expressed Consent on Performance of Obligations in E-Commerce. Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik, 2020, no 1 (88), pp. 58–62. (in Russian)

347.42

BCEHOX

1. Bakirova E.YU. YUridicheskie akty kak yuridicheskie dejstviya. Biznes v zakone, 2007, no. 3, pp. 200-201. (in Russian)

2. Boldyrev V.A. Soglasie na sovershenie sdelki: pravovaya priroda i mesto v sisteme yuridicheskih faktov. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 2012, no. 2, pp. 82-86. (in Russian)

3. Brezgulevskaya L.K. Grazhdansko-pravovoe regulirovanie soglasiya lica na sovershenie sdelki. Cand. sci. diss. abstr. Sankt-Peterburg, 2016, 19 p. (in Russian)

4. Brezgulevskaya L.K. O pravovoj prirode soglasiya na sovershenie sdelki. YUrist, 2014, no. 22, pp. 19-23. (in Russian)

5. Brezgulevskaya L.K. Problema soglasiya na sovershenie sdelok v svete reformy grazhdanskogo zakonodatel’stva. Zakon, 2014, no. 9, pp. 156- 165. (in Russian)

6. Vorob’eva E.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie sdelok, trebuyushchih soglasiya, po grazhdanskomu zakonodatel’stvu Rossijskoj Federacii. Cand. sci. diss. Moscow, 2016. 196 s. (in Russian)

7. Vorozhevich A.S. Princip estoppelya v dogovornom, processual’nom i korporativnom prave: analiz sudebnoj praktiki. EZH-YUrist, 2018, no. 2. Available at: https://www.eg-online.ru/article/364143 (date of access: 05.08.2018). (in Russian)

8. Grin’ O.S. Poruchitel’stvo: novoe v zakonodatel’nom regulirovanii i pravoprimenenii. Sud’ya, 2016, no. 9, pp. 15-20. (in Russian)

9. Druzhinin A. Konklyudentnye dejstviya. EZH-YUrist, 2015, no. 27. Available at: http://otrasli-prava.rf/article/19290 (date of access: 05.08.2018). (in Russian)

10. Efimova L.G. Ponyatie i pravovye osobennosti elektronnogo dogovora. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 2019, no. 7, pp. 84-90. (in Russian)

11. Kasatkin S.N. Ponyatie i priznaki soglasiya kak grazhdansko-pravovoj kategorii. Pravo i ekonomika, 2013, no. 3, pp. 69-73. (in Russian)

12. Kuznecova L.V. Obyazatel’stva dolzhny ispolnyat’sya tak, kak oni sformulirovany. Available at: https://zakon.ru/blog/2017/3/26/ obyazatelstva_dolzhny_ispolnyatsya_tak_kak_oni_sformulirovany (date of access: 05.08.2018). (in Russian)

13. Mineev O.A. Problemy realizacii principa nadlezhashchego ispolneniya obyazatel’stv v sovremennom grazhdanskom oborote. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2013, no. 1, pp. 35-39.

14. Mihajlova E.O. Pravilo estoppel’: material’nyj i processual’nyj aspekty. Koncept, 2016, no. 5. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ pravilo-estoppel-materialnyy-i-protsessualnyy-aspekty (date of access: 05.08.2018). (in Russian)

15. Savel’ev A.I. Dogovornoe pravo 2.0: «umnye» kontrakty kak nachalo konca klassicheskogo dogovornogo prava. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava, 2016, no. 3, pp. 32-60. (in Russian)

16. Halikov R.O. Ponyatie elektronnoj sdelki. Vestnik TISBI, 2005, no. 4. Available at: http://www.law.edu.ru/doc/document. asp?docID=1219324 (date of access: 05.08.2018). (in Russian)

17. Barnett R.E. Squaring Undisclosed Agency Law with Contract Theory. California Law Review, vol. 75, iss. 6, December, 1987, pp. 1969-2003.

18. Bayley E. The Clicks That Bind: Ways Users ‘Agree’ to Online Terms of Service. Electronic Frontier Foundation. November 16, 2009. Available at: https://www.eff.org/ru/wp/clicks-bind-ways-users-agree-online-terms-service (date of access: 05.08.2018).

19. Bix B.H. Consent and Contracts. The Routledge Handbook of the Ethics of Consent. London, Routledge, 2018, 26 p. Available at: https:// papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3031183 (date of access: 05.08.2018).

20. Farace D., Schöpfel J. Grey Literature in Library and Information Studies. Walter de Gruyter, 2010, 288 p.

21. Sachin M. Electronic Agents are Helpful and Without Risks for Business as well as Consumers. Available at: http://www.legalserviceindia. com/article/l245-Electronic-agents.html (date of access: 05.08.2018).

22. Weitzenboeck E.M. Electronic Agents and the Formation of Contracts, International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Oxford, 2001, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 204-234.

23. Wettig S., Zehendner E. A Legal Analysis of Human and Electronic Agents, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2004, no. 12, pp. 111-135.

24. Wettig S., Zehendner E. The Electronic Agent: A Legal Personality under German Law? Materials of the 2nd Workshop on the Law and Electronic Agents (LEA 2003), Edinburgh, June 24, 2003, pp. 97-112.