Averinskaya Svetlana Aleksandrovna ↑, Zabavko Roman Alekseevich ↑, Radchenko Olga Viktorovna ↑

The general trends of criminal law in the concept of crime, the significance of administrative prejudice in determining the wrongfulness of an act are analyzed. The main obstacles to the application of administrative prejudice are identified and analyzed. It is noted that administrative prejudice in criminal law conflicts with its basic principles: legality, justice and guilt. The arguments about the possibility of crime prevention through administrative prejudice do not hold water. The attitude of the scientific community to the problem is analyzed. It was revealed that most of the scientists have a negative attitude towards administrative prejudice. The ways of applying administrative prejudice in the criminal law of the Russian Federation are systematized. It is concluded that a more effective measure would be to single out the category of “criminal misconduct”, which would perform the same function.

administrative prejudice, criminal misconduct, petty theft, crime, principle of legality, principle of justice, principle of guilt

Averinskaya Svetlana Aleksandrovna

Candidate of Law, Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law, Law Institute, Irkutsk State University

1, K. Marx st., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation

e-mail: aver27@mail.ru

Zabavko Roman Alekseevich

Candidate of Law, Department of Criminal Law, Law Institute, Irkutsk State University

1, K. Marx st., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation

e-mail: zrairk@gmail.com

Radchenko Olga Viktorovna

Candidate of Law, Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law, Law Institute, Irkutsk State University

1, K. Marx st., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation

e-mail: radchenko.ov@mail.ru

Averinskaya S.V., Zabavko R.A., Radchenko O.V. Administrative Preduction in Criminal Law: Doctrinal Problems. Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik, 2020, no 1 (88), pp. 70–74. (in Russian)

343.232

COIVQZ

1. Vlasov YU.A., Mihal O.A. Administrativnaya preyudiciya kak vid ugolovnogo prostupka. Sovremennoe pravo, 2019, no. 6, pp. 119-125. (in Russian)

2. Dosaeva G.S. Administrativnaya preyudiciya (voprosy teorii i praktiki) i ugolovnyj prostupok kak novyj vid pravonarusheniya v RF. Pro¬bely v rossijskom zakonodatelstve, 2017, no. 3, pp. 235-237. (in Russian)

3. Ivanchin A.V. O polze razumnogo ispol’zovaniya administrativnoj preyudicii v ugolovnom prave (v svyazi s Postanovleniem Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 10 fevralya 2017 g. N 2-P). Ugolovnoe pravo, 2017, no. 4, pp. 50-53. (in Russian)

4. Kovalev M.I. Prestuplenie i prostupok. Problemy sovershenstvovani¬ya zakonodatelstva po ukrepleniyu pravoporyadka i usilenie borby s pra¬vonarusheniyami. Proceedings of the Conference Title. Sverdlovsk, 1982, pp. 11-12. (in Russian)

5. Korobeev A.I., SHirshov A.A. Ugolovnyj prostupok skvoz prizmu in¬stituta administrativnoj preyudicii: blago ili zlo? Ugolovnoe pravo, 2017, no. 4, pp. 68-72. (in Russian)

6. Lopashenko N.A. Administrativnoj preyudicii v ugolovnom prave – net! Vestnik Akademii Generalnoj prokuratury Rossijskoj Federacii, 2011, no. 3 (23), pp. 64-71. (in Russian)

7. Milyukov S.F. Administrativnoe i ugolovnoe zakonodatel’stvo: ry¬adom ili vmeste? Sootnoshenie prestuplenij i inyh pravonarushenij: sovre¬mennye problemy: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Lomonosov Moscow State Univ., 27–28 may, 2004, pp. 376-379. (in Russian)

8. Nedraga YA.N. “Ugolovnyj prostupok” i administrativnaya preyudiciya, sovremennyj format ugolovnogo prestupleniya. Ugolovnyj zakon Rossijskoj Federacii: problemy pravoprimeneniya i perspektivy soversh¬enstvovaniya: Proceedings of International Scientific and Practical Conference. Irkutsk, VSI MVD Rossii Publ., 2018, pp. 9-19. (in Russian)

9. Predsedatel Verhovnogo suda Rossii predlozhil schitat’ klevetu i is¬pol’zovanie poddel’nyh dokumentov ugolovnym prostupkom. Rossijskaya gazeta, 2017, no. 45 (7271). (in Russian)

10. Rogova E.V. Administrativnaya preyudiciya i ugolovnyj prostupok. Deyatel’nost’ pravoohranitelnyh organov v sovremennyh usloviyah: Proceed¬ings of the 22rd International Scientific and Practical Conference. Irkutsk, VSI MVD Rossii Publ., 2017, pp. 115-118. (in Russian)

11. Rogova E.V. Ugolovnyj prostupok i mezhotraslevaya differenciaciya otvetstvennosti. Vestnik Akademii Generalnoj prokuratury Rossijskoj Feder¬acii, 2017, no. 3 (59), pp. 23-29. (in Russian)

12. Spasovich V. Uchebnik ugolovnogo prava. Saint Petersburg, 1863, vol. 1. (in Russian)

13. Tarbagaev A.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost’ v ugolovnom prave. Pravovedenie, 1992, no. 2, pp. 62-68. (in Russian)

14. SHemyakin D.V. Problemnye voprosy ispol’zovaniya administra¬tivnoj preyudicii v ugolovnom prave. Rossijskij sledovatel, 2015, no. 15, pp. 45-47. (in Russian)