SIBERIAN LAW HERALD
ISSN 2071-8136 (print)
ISSN 2071-8144 (online)

List of issues > Siberian Law Herald 2021. 1

The editors received this article 15.08.2020


Electronic Evidence in the Civilistic Process

Author(s)
Nikitashina Natalia Alexandrovna, Maryasov Konstantin Vasilyevich
Abstract
The current civil procedure legislation refers to information obtained from electronic sources of information as written evidence. At the same time, electronic evidence is not an independent means of proof. The purpose of this article is to study the possibility and necessity of allocating electronic evidence as independent means of proof. The traditional approach to understanding the electronic document is based on the participation of the person in the information interaction as the author of the document and its performer. At the same time, the electronic document is characterized by its (special) properties related to its creation, change, preservation. In addition, the authors draw attention to the existence of electronic documents that do not have a human-readable form but create, modify or terminate rights and obligations. The study also points to the possibility of self-participation of computer tools in information interaction. In the article, the authors propose to distinguish electronic evidence as an independent means of proof, and also justify the theoretical and practical necessity of this approach to the legal regulation of the procedure of proof in civil and arbitration proceedings (research, recording, evaluation of evidence from electronic sources).
Keywords
electronic document, electronic evidence, evidence, written evidence, civil procedure
About the Authors
Nikitashina Natalia Alexandrovna – Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of Civil Law and Procedure Department of History and Law Institute of Khakass State University named after N. F. Katanov (90, Lenin st., Abakan, Republic of Khakassia, 655017, Russian Federation), e-mail: shinan@mail.ru

Maryasov Konstantin Vasilyevich – Lawyer at LLC «Legal Bureau «SOVETNIK» (310 of., 86, Taras Shevchenko st., Abakan, Republic of Khakassia, 6550017, Russian Federation), e-mail: mkv5@yandex.ru
For citation
Nikitashina N. A., Mar'yasov K. V. Elektronnye dokazatel'stva v civilisticheskom processe [Electronic Evidence in the Civilistic Process] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2021, no 1(92), pp. 74–79. DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2021.1.74. (in Russian).
UDC
347.941:004.087
EDN
VFSXDS
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26516/2071-8136.2021.1.74
References
1. Bonner A.T. Izbrannyye trudy: v 7 t. T. 5. Problemy teorii sudebnykh dokazatelstv [Selected works: in 7 vol. V.V. Problems of theory of court evidence] / Bonner A. Moskow, Prospekt [Moscow: Prospect], 2017, 614 p. (in Russian)

2. Vershinin A.P. Elektronnyy dokument: pravovaya forma i dokazatel- stvo v sude [Electronic document: legal form and proof in court]. Moskow, OOO «Gorodets-izdat» [Moscow, LLC “Gorodets-published”], 2000, 248 p. (in Russian)

3. Kontseptsiya edinogo Grazhdanskogo protsessualnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Concept of the Unified Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]/ URL: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/

doc/70726874/#review// [ATP GARANT”] (date of access: 04.03.2020). (in Russian)

4. Kurs dokazatelstvennogo prava: Grazhdanskiy protsess. Arbi- trazhnyy protsess. Administrativnoye sudoproizvodstvo [Course of evidentiary law: Civil procedure. Arbitration process. Administrative proceedings] /S.F. Athaniev, O.V. Baulin, I.N. Lukyanova [etc.]; Under ed. M.A. Fokin. The 2nd prod., reslave. And additional/ Moscow, Statute, 2019, 414 p. (in Russian)

5. Maryasov K.V. Pravovyye riski perekhoda k tsifrovomu obshchest- vu i tsifrovoy ekonomike v usloviyakh sovremennoy Rossii [Legal risks of transition to digital society and digital economy in conditions of modern Russia], Yuridicheskaya tekhnika [Legal technique]. 2019, № 13, pp. 726731. (in Russian)

6. Nahova E.A. Problemy elektronnykh dokazatelstv v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [Problems of Electronic Evidence in the Civilistic Process], Lenin- gradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal [Leningrad Legal Journal]. 2015, № 4 (42), pp. 301-312. (in Russian)

7. Sahnova T.V. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa [Course of Civil Pro- cess]/T.V. Sahnova. -2-e izd.. pererab. i dop. Moscow, Statut [2nd Ed., ReWork. And additional - Moscow, Statute], 2014, 784 p. (in Russian)

8. Treushnikov M.K. Sudebnyye dokazatelstva [Judicial Evidence/M.K. Treushnikov]. 5-e izd. dop. - Moscow, Izdatelskiy Dom «Gorodets» [5th Ed., Additional - Moscow: Publishing House “Gorodets,”] 2018, 304 p. (in Russian)

Full text (russian)