Lichichan Oleg Petrovich ↑, Arzumanov Igor Ashotovich ↑, Shishkin Sergey Ivanovich ↑

The analysis of methodological problems of interrelation of the documents of strategic planning of the federal level, developed within the framework of goal-setting according to the sectoral and territorial principles, is directly linked to the issues of settlement. The article considers the norms of the corpus of federal regulatory legal acts adopted within the framework of goal-setting in the process of strategic planning of socio-economic development of territories, which includes the provisions of the norms of the Strategy of Socio-economic Development of the Russian Federation, Federal Law No. 172 “On Strategic Planning”, the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation, the Resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation related to the role of local self-government bodies in the implementation of the settlement policy as a factor of socio-economic development of territories. The specifics of the federal policy of territorial development of the regions, which is based on the participation of not only the federal center, but also the state bodies of the regional level of the vertical of power, are revealed. It is argued that the existing “vertical” of public administration does not include an imperative function in relation to the local authorities, which are not assigned the responsibility of developing strategies for the socio-economic development of the municipality. It is determined that, in methodological terms, such consequences should include the need to differentiate measures of state support for municipal territorial entities, regional typologization of settlements when considering budget and urban development policies. The problems related to the legal nature of the federal district in relation to the nature and powers in the field of strategic planning of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation are identified. It is argued that the factors influencing the processes of formation and implementation of the state policy of regional development and directly related to the issues of strategic planning include not only the features of the federal structure, geo-political, geo-deterministic, socio-cultural factors, but also a significant difference in the levels of regional socio-economic development and territorial population. The analysis of methodological problems of interrelation of the documents of strategic planning of the federal level, developed within the framework of goal-setting according to the sectoral and territorial principles, is directly linked to the issues of settlement. The article considers the norms of the corpus of federal regulatory legal acts adopted within the framework of goal-setting in the process of strategic planning of socio-economic development of territories, which includes the provisions of the norms of the Strategy of Socio-economic Development of the Russian Federation, Federal Law No. 172 “On Strategic Planning”, the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation, the Resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation related to the role of local self-government bodies in the implementation of the settlement policy as a factor of socio-economic development of territories. The specifics of the federal policy of territorial development of the regions, which is based on the participation of not only the federal center, but also the state bodies of the regional level of the vertical of power, are revealed. It is argued that the existing “vertical” of public administration does not include an imperative function in relation to the local authorities, which are not assigned the responsibility of developing strategies for the socio-economic development of the municipality. It is determined that, in methodological terms, such consequences should include the need to differentiate measures of state support for municipal territorial entities, regional typologization of settlements when considering budget and urban development policies. The problems related to the legal nature of the federal district in relation to the nature and powers in the field of strategic planning of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation are identified. It is argued that the factors influencing the processes of formation and implementation of the state policy of regional development and directly related to the issues of strategic planning include not only the features of the federal structure, geo-political, geo-deterministic, socio-cultural factors, but also a significant difference in the levels of regional socio-economic development and territorial population.

methodology, strategic planning, strategic planning documents, federal district, local government: goal setting, forecasting, planning, programming, territorial principle

Lichichan Oleg Petrovich - Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Administrative Law, Director, Law Institute, Irkutsk State University (1, K. Marx st., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation), e-mail: director@law.isu.ru

Arzumanov Igor Ashotovich - Doctor of Cultural Studies, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Constitutional Law and Theory of Law, Law Institute, Irkutsk State University (1, K. Marx st., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation), e-mail: arzumanov@mail.ru

Shishkin Sergey Ivanovich - Doctor of Law, Professor, Head of the Departament of Constitutional Law and Theory of Law, Law Institute, Irkutsk State University (1, K. Marx st., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation), e-mail: director@law.isu.ru

Lichichan O.P., Arzumanov I.A., Shishkin S.I. Metodologicheskie problemy vzaimosvyazi dokumentov strategicheskogo planirovaniya federal'nogo urovnya, razrabatyvaemyh v ramkah celepolaganiya po otraslevomu i territorial'nomu principam (chast' 2) [Methodological problems of interconnection of strategic planning documents of the federal level, developed within the framework of the target on sectoral and territorial principles (part 2)] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2021, no 2(93), pp. 9–13. DOI 10.26516 / 2071-8136.2021.3.9. (in Russian).

34:332.133

ZNGBTW

1. Buhval'd E.M. Vremya vernut'sya k zakonu o gosudarstvennoj poli- tike regional'nogo razvitiya [Time to return to the law on the state policy of regional development]. Zakonodaterstvo i ekonomika [Legislation and Economics], 2017, no. 2, pp. 7-16. (in Russian)

2. Buhvald E.M. Pravovoe regulirovanie strategicheskogo prostranst- vennogo i territorial'nogo planirovaniya [Legal regulation of strategic spatial and territorial planning]. Zhurnalrossijskogoprava [Journal of Russian law], 2019, no. 11, pp. 131-143. (in Russian)

3. Buhvald E.M., Pogrebinskaya V.A. Strategicheskoe planirovanie v Rossii: istoricheskij opyt i realii ekonomiki [Strategic planning in Russia: historical experience and realities of the economy]. Federalizm [Federalism], 2014, no. 4 (76), pp. 21-36. (in Russian)

4. Buhvald E.M. Strategicheskoe prostranstvennoe planirovanie: mak- roregiony i sub”ekty Rossijskoj Federacii [Strategic spatial planning: macroregions and subjects of the Russian Federation]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava [Journal of Russian law], 2020, no. 3, pp. 31-44. (in Russian)

5. Vorobeva M.A. Federalizm i “vertikal'” vlasti v sovremennoj Rossii [Federalism and the “vertical” of power in modern Russia]. Vlast [The Authority], 2008, no. 6, pp. 48-51. (in Russian)

6. Kozhevnikov A. Strategiya prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossijskoj Federacii i perspektivy transformacii rossijskogo prostranstva [Strategy of spatial development of the Russian Federation and the prospects for transformation of the Russian space]. Voprosy territorial’nogo razvitiya [Questions of territorial development], 2019, no. 3 (48), pp. 1-9. (in Russian)

7. Mel'nikov N.N. et al. Kommentarij k Gradostroitel’nomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii ot 29 dekabrya 2004 g., no 190-FZ [Commentary on the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation of December 29, 2004 N 190-FZ]. Special'no dlya sistemy GARANT [Especially for the GARANT system], 2018. Available at: http://internet.garant.ru/#/document/77565144/ paragraph/1394/doclist/8632/showentries/0/highlight/:0 (date of access:

03.11.2020) . (in Russian)

8. Kuzyk B. O formirovanii sistemy strategicheskogo upravleniya mod- ernizaciej i razvitiem rossijskoj ekonomiki [On the formation of a system of strategic management of modernization and development of the Russian economy]. Ekonomicheskie strategii [Economic strategies], 2014, vol. 16, no. 2 (118), pp. 24-29. (in Russian)

9. Maksimushkina O.S. Mezhbyudzhetnye otnosheniya: ot vyravnivani- ya k razvitiyu [Inter-budgetary relations: from alignment to development]. Byudzhet [The Budget], 2012, no. 5, pp. 31-33. (in Russian)

10. Podporina I. Logika i politika: Mezhbyudzhetnye otnosheniya [Logic and politics: interbudgetary relations]. Nasha vlast' dela i lica [Our power: affairs and persons], 2005, no. 2, pp. 30-31. (in Russian).

11. Selimhanov Z. Genezis makroregiona v sisteme gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [Genesis of the macroregion in the system of public administration]. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya [Economy and management: problems, solutions], 2018, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 60-64. (in Russian)