The article examines the ambiguity in the interpretation of article 76.2 of the Criminal code and article 25.1 of the Criminal procedure code of the Russian Federation to establish terms of compensation for the damage and (or) smoothing caused by the crime harm. The author substantiates the argument about the fallacy of considering this condition only formally, the author focuses on the mandatory establishment in this case of the characteristics of the identity of the guilty person and the measure of public danger of the committed act. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the approach proposed by the author to the study of the problem of establishing such a condition. In particular, the author considers it essential to solve such a problem to study the legal nature of compensation for damage and compensation for damage when a criminal case (criminal prosecution) is terminated on this basis. The author defines the specifics, identifies the main purposes of such a legal phenomenon in the context of a legal problem. The article concludes that if the preliminary investigation body and (or) the court (justice of the peace) the lack of property harmful consequences from the crime, the failure to make reparation is not to be considered as an obstacle to the termination of criminal proceedings on the grounds provided by article 25.1 of the Criminal procedure code of the Russian Federation, article 76.2 of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation. As a conclusion, the scientific work has prepared a specific text of the interpretation of the condition in the relevant explanations of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, which will exclude ambiguity on this issue from the law enforcement officer.

judicial penalty, termination of prosecution, criminal proceeding, termination of the case, criminal proceedings, making amends, fine, legal proceedings, institution of criminal procedure, compensation for damage

Fatyanov Ilya Valeryevich – Magistrate, Judicial District No. 1 of the Berezovsky City Judicial District (36, Mira st., Berezovsky, Kemerovo region, 652421, Russian Federation), ResearcherID: ABC-8203-2021, ORCID: 0000-0001-7713-6684, е-mail: fiv_d@mail.ru

Fat'yanov I.V. O probleme ustanovleniya usloviya o vozmeshchenii ushcherba i zaglazhivanii vreda pri prekrashchenii ugolovnogo dela (ugolovnogo presledovaniya) v svyazi s naznacheniem mery ugolovno-pravovogo haraktera v vide sudebnogo shtrafa [On the problem of establishing a condition for compensation for damage and making amends for damage when a criminal case (criminal prosecution) is terminated in connection with the appointment of a criminal law measure in the form of a court fine] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2021, no 4(95), pp. 129–134.DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2021.4.129. (in Russian).

343.15

RMOLDU

1. Anoshchenkova P.V. Ugolovno-pravovoe uchenie o poterpevshem [Criminal law doctrine of the victim]. Moscow, Volters Kluver Publ., 2006, 248 p. (in Russian).

2. Blagov E.V. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti v svyazi s vozmeshcheniem ushcherba [Exemption from criminal liability in connection with compensation for damages]. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava [Actual problems of Russian law], 2019, vol. 8, pp. 118-127. (in Rus-sian).

3. Dikarev I.P. Ob unifikatsii protsessual’noi formy napravleniya ugolovnykh del v sud [On the unification of the procedural form of sending crimi-nal cases to the court]. Zakonnost’ [Legality], 2017, vol. 8, pp. 53-56. (in Russian).

4. Korobov P.V. Vidy osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti i printsip prezumptsii nevinovnosti [Types of exemption from criminal liability and the principle of presumption of innocence]. Rossiiskaya yustitsiya [Russian Justice], 2012, vol. 1, pp. 37-40. (in Russian).

5 Koryakin A.L. Teoriya i praktika prekrashcheniya ugolovnogo dela v svyazi s naznacheniem mery ugolovno-pravovogo kharaktera v vide sudebnogo shtrafa [Theory and practice of termination of a criminal case in connection with the appointment of a criminal law measure in the form of a court fine]. Vestnik Omskoy yuridicheskoy akademii [Bulletin of the Omsk Law Academy], 2017, vol. 1, pp. 65-70. (in Russian).

6. Larin E.G., Pavlov A.V. Otmena prokurorom postanovleniya o prekrashchenii ugolovnogo dela (ugolovnogo presledovaniya) po reabilitiruyush-chim osnovaniyam [Cancellation by the prosecutor of the decision on termination of the criminal case (criminal prosecution) on rehabilitating grounds]. Zakonnost’ [Legality], 2018, vol. 8, pp. 43-44. (in Russian).

7. Lutsenko N.P. Sudebnyi shtraf: problemy teorii i pravoprimeneniya [Judicial penalty: problems of theory and law enforcement. Cand. sci. diss. abstr.] Krasnoyarsk, 2020, 39 p. (in Russian).

8. Poluektova A.G. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti s naznacheniem sudebnogo shtrafa: teoreticheskii i prikladnoi aspekty [Exemp-tion from criminal liability with the appointment of a court fine: theoretical and applied aspects. Cand. sci. diss. abstr.]. Moscow, 2018, 28 p. (in Rus-sian).

9. Skripchenko N.Yu. Sudebnyi shtraf: problemy realizatsii zakonodatel’nykh novell [Court fine: problems of implementation of legislative innova-tions]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law], 2017, vol. 7, pp. 102-105. (in Russian).

10. Stel’makh V.Yu. Protsessual’nye aspekty prekrashcheniya ugolovnogo presledovaniya s naznacheniem sudebnogo shtrafa [Procedural aspects of the termination of criminal prosecution with the appointment of a court fine]. Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal [Russian Law Journal], 2018, vol. 6, pp. 117-129. (in Russian).

11. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Obshchaya i Osobennaya chasti: uchebnik [Criminal law of the Russian Federation. General and Special parts]. Moscow. Kontrakt, Infra-M. 2013. 704 p. (in Russian).

12. Khlebnitsynoi E.A. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti s naznacheniem sudebnogo shtrafa [Exemption from criminal liability with the appointment of a court fine. Cand. sci. diss. abstr.]. Moscow, 2019, 25 p. (in Russian).

13. Yusupov M.Yu. Praktika i problemy primeneniya sudebnogo shtrafa [Practice and problems of applying a court fine]. Ugolovnyi protses [Crim-inal proceedings], 2017, vol. 1, pp. 81-87. (in Russian).