The article examines the phenomenon of civil disobedience from the standpoint of justice. The views of foreign political theorists on civil disobedience are analyzed. It is concluded that foreign authors usually identify such criteria for the admissibility of civil disobedience as extreme necessity, probability of success, proportionality, correct motive, semi-communicative nature, publicity and non-violence of civil disobedience, and the readiness to be punished for it. Further, these views are criticized. The point of view is expressed that only extreme necessity and proportionality are convincing criteria for the moral justification of civil disobedience. In turn, the correct motive and semi-communicative character are justified as signs of civil disobedience, not as criteria for its admissibility. At the same time, non-violence, publicity and readiness to accept punishment are considered only as manifestations of the semi-communicative nature of civil disobedience. Further, the views of domestic jurists are analyzed. It is shown, in particular, that the widespread opinion among them, according to which violation of the law is permissible only in cases of obvious and extreme injustice of this law, is superficial, and does not take into account, for example, the case when a minor violation of the law is the only mean contributing to the correction of minor injustices, but does not undermine the rule of law as such. In addition, it refutes the positivist thesis that violation of the law cannot be admissible. Civil disobedience is justified by the understanding of the social system as “striving for justice”. It is argued that for a social system to promote justice, it must be both firm and flexible. It is concluded that the social norm is always a compromise between abstractness and concreteness: the relative abstractness of the law is an effective way to sacrifice concreteness as such (fair or unfair) in order to ensure at least partial justice. It is indicated that it is necessary to find the optimal balance of abstractness and concreteness, on the other hand, it is also necessary to determine the consequences of non-compliance with the law that does not correspond to the optimum.

civil disobedience, justice, stability, offense

Shaveko Nikolai Aleksandrovich – Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Senior Researcher, Udmurt Branch of the Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (4, Lomonosov st., Izhevsk, 426034, Russian Federation), ORCID: 0000-0002-5481-7425, ResearcherID: K-4637-2018, e-mail: Shavekonikolai@gmail.com

Shaveko N. A. Grazhdanskoe nepovinovenie: ponyatie i kriterii dopustimosti [Civil Disobedience: The Concept and the Criteria for Admissibility] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2022, no 1(96), pp. 9–16. DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2022.1.9. (in Russian).

323.25

1. Alekseev S.S. Sobraniye sochineniy: v 10 t. T. 9. [Collected works in 10 volumes, volume 9]. Moscow, Statute Publ., 2010, 495 p. (in Russian)

2. Alekseev S.S. Teoriia prava. [The theory of law]. Moscow, BEK Publ., 1994. 224 p. (in Russian)

3. Apresian R.G. Grazhdanskoe nepovinovenie - v politicheskoi teorii i sotsial’noi praktike (Dzhon Rolz i Mokhandas Gandi) [Civil Disobedience-in Po-litical Theory and Social Practice (John Rawls and Mohandas Gandhi)]. Nasilie i nenasilie: Filosofiia, politika, etika [Violence and nonviolence: Philosophy, Politics, Ethics]. Moscow, Independent Radio Broadcasting Foundation, Open Society Institute (Soros Foundation) Publ., 2003, pp. 54-70. (in Russian)

4. Grishchenko L.L., Gladkikh V.I. O sovremennykh printsipakh pravovogo obespecheniia okhrany obshchestvennogo poriadka i obshchestvennoi be-zopasnosti [On modern principles of legal support for the protection of public order and public safety]. Vestnik GUU [Bulletin of the State University of Man-agement], 2013, no. 8, pp. 132-137. (in Russian)

5. Dworkin R. O pravakh vser’ez. [Taking rights seriously] Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2004, 392 p. (in Russian)

6. Il’in I.A. Pochemu my verim v Rossiiu: Soch. [Why do we believe in Russia: collection of works]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2007, 909 p. (in Russian)

7. Kapustin B.G. Moral’nyi vybor v politike [Moral choice in Politics] Moscow, Moscow University Publ., 2004, 496 p. (in Russian)

8. Mirovich A. Ogranicheniia i nesostoiatel’nost’ kontseptsii grazhdanskogo nepovinoveniia po Rolzu [Limitations and inconsistency of the concept of civil disobedience according to Rawls]. Vestnik Cherepovetskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Cherepovets State University], 2013, no. 4 (52), pp. 43-47. (in Russian)

9. Novgorodtsev P.I. Pravo i nravstvennost’. [Law and morality]. Pravovedenie [Jurisprudence], 1995, no. 6, pp. 103-113. (in Russian)

10. Problemy obshchei teorii gosudarstva i prava [Problems of the general theory of state and law]. Pod red. Nersesiantsa V.S. Moscow, Norm Publ., 2006, 813 p. (in Russian)

11. Rawls J. Teoriia spravedlivosti. [A theory of justice]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2010, 534 p. (in Russian)

12. Teoriia gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik [The theory of law]. Pod red. N.I. Matuzov, A.V. Mal’ko. Moscow, Jurist Publ., 2004, 512 p. (in Russian)

13. Habermas J. Mezhdu naturalizmom i religiei. [Between naturalism and religion]. Moscow, The whole world Publ., 2011. 336 p. (in Russian)

14. Shaveko N.A. Kategoricheskie pravovye printsipy v epokhu postmoderna. Interv’iu s professorom Otfridom Kheffe [Categorical legal principles in the postmodern era. Interview with Professor Otfried Hoeffe]. Kantovskii sbornik [Kantian Journal], 2018, no. 1. pp. 62-73. (in Russian)

15. Shershenevich G.F. Izbrannoe: V 6 t. T. 4. [Selected works in 6 vol.: vol. 4]. Moscow, Satute Publ., 2016, 752 p. (in Russian)

16. Elementarnye nachala obshchei teorii prava: ucheb. posobie dlia vuzov [Elementary principles of the general theory of law]. Pod obshch. red. V.I. Chervoniuka. Moscow, Colossus Publ., 2003, 544 p. (in Russian)

17. Blaakman M. Civil disobedience in a distorted public sphere. Krisis. 2012. Iss. 3, pp. 27-36.

18. Brownlee K., Delmas C. Civil Disobedience. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edward N. Zalta (ed.). 2017. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/civil-disobedience/

19. Lai T-H. Justifying Uncivil Disobedience. Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, vol. 5, 2019, pp. 90-114.

20. Raz J. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford, 1979. 292 p. (in English)

21. Suber P. Civil disobedience. Philosophy of Law: An Encyclopedia. Ed. Christopher B. Gray. Garland, 1999, vol. 1, pp. 110-113.