SIBERIAN LAW HERALD
ISSN 2071-8136 (print)
ISSN 2071-8144 (online)

List of issues > Siberian Law Herald 2022. 2

Received on 01.12.2021; approved on 03.02.2022; accepted for publication on 13.05.2022


Certain issues of qualifying petty theft committed repeatedly (article 7.27 of the Code of Administrative offenses of the Russian federation and article 158.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

Author(s)
Smirnova Ksenia Vasilyevna
Abstract
Based on a comprehensive analysis of the norms provided for by Art. 7.27 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation and Art. 158.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, it was concluded that the legal regulation of liability for petty theft contains a number of fundamental theoretical errors. In particular, it is noted that the legislator, in the interests of preventing crimes against property, ignores the social danger of acts. It is concluded that the basis of criminal liability, contrary to the requirements of Part 1 of Art. 1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is specified in the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation. Objective signs of petty theft are subjected to a detailed analysis. Measures are proposed to optimize the legal regulation of liability for petty theft committed repeatedly.
Keywords
petty theft, administrative prejudice, repetition, criminal liability
About the Authors
Smirnova Ksenia Vasilyevna – Senior Lecturer, Department of Administrative Law and Administrative Activities, East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation (110, Lermontov st., Irkutsk, 664074, Russian Federation), e-mail: oksun4ik-87@mail.ru
For citation
Smirnova K. V. Otdel'nye voprosy kvalifikacii melkogo hishcheniya, sovershennogo neodnokratno (st. 7.27 KoAP RF i st. 158.1 UK RF) [Certain issues of qualifying petty theft committed repeatedly (article 7.27 of the Code of Administrative offenses of the Russian federation and article 158.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2022, no 2(97), pp. 33–38. DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2022.2.33. (in Russian).
UDC
343.7
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26516/2071-8136.2022.2.33
References
1. Averinskaya S.V., Zabavko R.A., Radchenko O.V. Administrativnaya preyudiciya v ugolovnom prave: doktrinal’nye protivorechiya [Administrative prejudice in criminal law: doctrinal contradictions]. Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald], 2020, no. 1 (88), pp. 70-74. (in Russian)

2. Gudkov A.P. Bezvozmezdnost’ kak priznak hishcheniya [Gratuitousness as a sign of theft]. Yuridicheskaya nauka v Kitae i Rossii [Legal science in China and Russia], 2017, no. 1, pp. 177-180. (in Russian)

3. Ermakova O.V. Aktual’nye voprosy otgranicheniya nahodki ot hishcheniya [Actual issues of delimitation of finds from theft]. Pravovye problemy ukrepleniya rossijskoj gosudarstvennosti: Sbornik statej [Legal problems of strengthening Russian statehood: Collection of articles]. Editors: O.I. Andreeva, S.A. Eliseev, L.M. Prozumentov, M.K. Sviridov, V.A. Utkin, N.S. Dergach; Tomsk, Tomsk State University Publ., 2015, pp. 23-25. (in Russian)

4. Korobeev A.I., Shirshov A.A. Ugolovnyj prostupok skvoz’ prizmu instituta administrativnoj preyudicii: blago ili zlo? [Criminal offense through the prism of the institute of administrative prejudice: good or evil?]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal law], 2017, no. 4, pp. 68-72. (in Russian)

5. Litvinchuk D.Yu. Razgranichenie administrativnyh ekologicheskih pravonarushenij i ekologicheskih prestuplenij: zakonodatel’nyj i doktrinal’nyj aspekty [Differentiation of administrative environmental offenses and environmental crimes: legislative and doctrinal aspects]. Vestnik Grodnenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni YAnki Kupaly. Seriya 4. Pravovedenie [Bulletin of the Grodno State University named after Yanka Kupala. Series 4. Jurisprudence], 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 49-57. (in Russian)

6. Lopashenko N.A. Administrativnoj preyudicii v ugolovnom prave - net! [There is no administrative prejudice in criminal law!]. Vestnik Akademii General’noj prokuratury Rossijskoj Federacii [Bulletin of the Academy of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation], 2011, no. 3 (23), pp. 64-71. (in Russian)

7. Malikova Zh.Zh. Otgranichenie ugolovno-nakazuemoj krazhi ot administrativnogo pravonarusheniya (melkogo hishcheniya) i ot grazhdansko-pravovogo delikta (nahodki) [Delimitation of criminally punishable theft from an administrative offense (petty theft) and from a civil tort (finds)]. Nauchnye issledovaniya vysshej shkoly v usloviyah Severnogo regiona [In the collection: Scientific studies of higher education in the conditions of the Northern region]. Tyumen, Khanty-Mansiysk, 2018, pp. 179-182. (in Russian)

8. Razgranichenie ponyatij “beskhoznaya veshch’”, “nahodka” (GK RF) ot hishcheniya chuzhogo imushchestva, ustanovlennogo Ugolovnym kodeksom Rossijskoj Federacii: uchebnoe posobie [Distinguishing between the concepts of “ownerless thing”, “find” (the Civil Code of the Russian Federation) from theft of another’s property, established by the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: textbook]. Ed. O.V. Radchenko, E.A. Tayurskaya, T.A. Trifonova. Irkutsk, FGKOU VO VSI MIA of Russia Publ., 2016, 76 p. (in Russian)

9. Rogova E.V., Zabavko R.A. Mezhotraslevaya differenciaciya otvetstvennosti za nezakonnuyu rubku lesnyh nasazhdenij [Intersectoral differentiation of responsibility for illegal logging of forest plantations]. Ugolovno-pravovoe vozdejstvie i ego rol’ v preduprezhdenii prestupnosti (IV Saratovskie ugolovno-pravovye chteniya) : Sbornik statej po materialam IV Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, Saratov, 30 sentyabrya – 01 oktyabrya 2019 goda [Criminal legal impact and its role in crime prevention (IV Saratov criminal law readings): Collection of articles based on the materials of the IV All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, Saratov, September 30 - October 01, 2019]. Under the general editorship of N.A. Lopashenko. Saratov, Saratov State Law Academy Publ., 2019, pp. 309-312. (in Russian)

10. Rogova E.V. Ugolovnyj prostupok v sisteme mezhotraslevoj differenciacii otvetstvennosti [Criminal offense in the system of intersectoral differentiation of responsibility]. Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke : materialy XVI Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii [Criminal law: a development strategy in the XXI century: materials of the XVI International Scientific and Practical Conference, Moscow, January 24–25, 2019]. Moscow, RG-Press Publ., 2019, pp. 401-406. (in Russian)

11. Foinitsky I.Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Chast’ Osobennaya. Posyagatel’stva lichnye i imushchestvennye. [Course of criminal law. Part Special. Violations of personal and property]. Pgetrograd, 1916. Available at: http://www.studmed.ru/foynickiy-iya-kurs-ugolovnogo-prava_15e16b26e9a.html# (date of access: 21.08.2019). (in Russian)

12. Yani P.S. Kvalifikaciya hishchenij: moment okonchaniya, bezvozmezdnost’, ushcherb [Qualification of theft: the moment of termination, gratuitousness, damage]. Zakonnost’ [Legitimacy], 2015, no. 12 (974), pp. 43-47. (in Russian)

Full text (russian)