The article highlights the peculiarity of the rules for making a decision by the court according to the rules on simplified proceedings, notes the incompleteness in this regard, begun in 2016, of the reform of the civil procedure legislation, which negatively affects the application of the procedure under consideration. In the research, the author focuses on the court decision made as a result of the consideration of a civil case in a truncated form in connection with the likely consequences of its cancellation. Research results. Arguments are given for the need for legislative consolidation of the preparation of a decision in full, including the reasoning part, as a general mandatory rule of a simplified procedure. The article substantiates the motivation as an integral and inextricably linked with other procedural institutions property of a court decision. A critical assessment of the grounds for preparing a reasoned decision is given. The law-making activity of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation is noted, which negatively affects the stability of the state system. The conclusion is formulated that the approach to the preparation of a reasoned judicial act does not correspond to the established goals of improving legislation, the essence of simplified procedures. There is an indissoluble connection between the rules of consideration of the case in a simplified procedure by the court of first instance and consideration of the complaint by the court of appeal. The article presents the judicial practice, revealing the content of the grounds for annulment of the court decision. There is a need to differentiate the powers of the court of appeal, depending on the basis of the cancellation of the court’s decision. Discussions and conclusions. Recommendations for further improvement of the civil procedure rules on simplified proceedings in terms of the rules for making a court decision, as well as the grounds and procedure for its cancellation, have been developed.

civil procedure, simplified proceedings, court decision, motivation part, abolition of court decision

Staritsyn Alexey Yuryevich – Senior Lecturer of the Department of Civil Law and Procedure, Institute of Justice, Baikal State University (11, Lenin st., Irkutsk, 664003, Russia Federation), ORСID: 0000-0003-4032-6489, e-mail: StaritsynAU@gmail.com

Staritsyn A. Yu. Reshenie, prinyatoe po delu v ramkah uproshchennogo proizvodstva [The court decision of simplified proceedings] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2022, no 2(97), pp. 122–126. DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2022.2.122. (in Russian).

347.9

1. Borisova E.A. Apellyatsionnoe obzhalovanie resheniya po delu, rassmatrivaemomu v poryadke uproshchennogo proizvodstva [Appeal on a judgment delivered through simplified procedure]. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii [The Herald of Economic Justice of the Russian Federation], 2017, no. 3, рp. 76-86. (in Russian)

2. Potapenko E.G. O neobkhodimosti motivirovannogo resheniya suda po grazhdanskomu delu [On the necessity of a motivated court decision in civil cases]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa [The Herald of Civil Procedure], 2018, no. 4, рp. 279-289. (in Russian)

3. Smagina E.S. Novye pravila razmeshcheniya sudebnykh aktov v seti internet v svete realizatsii printsipa glasnosti v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [New rules for publication of judicial acts on the internet in view of the publicity principle implementation in civil proceedings]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess [The arbitration and civil procedure], 2018, no. 1, рp. 26-29. (in Russian)

4. Sherstyuk V.M. Neposredstvennye svyazi proizvodstva v sude pervoi instantsii i proizvodstva po peresmotru sudebnykh aktov v grazhdanskom protsesse [Direct links between proceedings in the court of first instance and proceedings on the revision of judicial acts in civil procedure]. Sovremennoe pravo [The modern law], 2018, no. 2, рp. 55-60. (in Russian)

5. Yudel’son K.S. Problema dokazyvaniya v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsesse [The problem of proof in the Soviet civil process]. Moscow, Gosyurizdat Publ., 1951, 296 р. (in Russian)

6. Yudina Yu.V. Dostupnost’ pravosudiya: ot idei k realiyam [Access to justice: from idea to reality]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess [The arbitration and civil procedure], 2016, no. 11, pр. 7-11. (in Russian)

7. Yakusheva N.E. Differentsiatsiya polnomochii suda apellyatsionnoi instantsii v uproshchennom proizvodstve v zavisimosti ot defektov sudebnykh aktov sudov pervoi instantsii [Differentiation of authorities of court of appeal in summary proceedings depending on defects of court rulings of first instance courts]. Administrator suda [The court administrator], 2017, no. 37, pр. 41-44. (in Russian)