The article examines the problems of fixing the principle of dispositivity in civil procedural legislation, as well as the complexity of its implementation. The author explores one of the fundamental functional principles of the civil process, analyzing pre-revolutionary, Soviet and modern scientific literature. The negative legal consequences of the absence of a definition of this principle in the civil procedural codes are analyzed. The necessity of a uniform regulation of the concept and content of the principle of dispositivity in the Civil Procedure and Arbitration Procedural Codes of the Russian Federation. It is proposed to equally formulate the active powers of the court in civil and arbitration proceedings. Attention is focused on the fact that the provisions of the Decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court and judicial practice must exactly comply with the procedural law in terms of implementing the principle of dispositivity. Among other things, the right of the court to go beyond the limits of the appeal is analyzed in detail, proposals are made to change the procedural legislation.

civil process; principles of civil process, dispositiveness, dispositivity principle, arbitration process.

Kuras Tatyana Leonidovna – Candidate of Sciences (History), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Justice, Law Institute, Irkutsk state University (1, K. Marx st., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation), ORСID: 0000-0003-1141-4543, e-mail: tanya_kuras@mail.ru

Kuras T.L. Princip dispozitivnosti v rossijskom grazhdanskom processe: sovremennye i istoricheskie aspekty [The principle of dispositivity in the Russian civil procedure: modern and historical aspects] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2022, no 3(98), pp. 69–77. DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2022.3.69. (in Russian).

347.91/.95

1. Bonner A.T. Zakonnost’ i spravedlivost’ v pravoprimenitel’noj deyatel’nosti [Legitimacy and justice in law enforcement]. Moscow, 1992, 320 p. (in Russian)

2. Borisova E. A. Pravilo o zaprete povorota k hudshemu [The rule on the prohibition of a turn for the worse] Rossijskaya yusticiya [Russian justice]. 2007, no. 7, pp. 42-44. (in Russian)

3. Bortnikova N.A. Iskovaya davnost’ [Limitation of actions. Access from the reference legal system]. ConsultantPlus : Legal reference system. (in Russian)

4. Vaneeva L.A. Princip dispozitivnosti sovetskogo grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava [The principle of optionality of the Soviet civil procedural law]. Voprosy razvitiya i zashchity prav grazhdan [Questions of development and protection of the rights of citizens]. Kalinin, 1977, pp. 103-107. (in Russian)

5. Vas’kovskij E.V. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo processa. Novoe izd., perepech. s izd. 1917 g. [Textbook of civil procedure. New ed., reprint. from ed. 191] Krasnodar, 2003. 464 p. (in Russian)

6. Voronov A.F. Grazhdanskij process: evolyuciya dispozitivnosti [Civil process: the evolution of discretion]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2007, 149 p. (in Russian)

7. Voronov A.F. Principy grazhdanskogo processa: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee [Principles of civil process: past, present, future]. Moscow, Gorodec Publ., 2009, 496 p. (in Russian)

8. Glodina A.V. Aktivnost’ suda kak ogranichitel’ dejstviya principa dispozitivnosti v administrativnom sudoproizvodstve [The activity of the court as a limiter of the principle of discretion in administrative proceedings] Administrator suda [Administrator of the court]. 2018, no. 1, pp. 14-16. (in Russian)

9. Gorodyskij Ya.K. Nashi sudy i sudebnye poryadki po dannym revizii 1895 goda [Our courts and judicial procedures according to the audit of 1895] Zhurnal Ministerstva yusticii [Journal of the Ministry of Justice]. 1901, no. 6, pp. 78-137. (in Russian)

10. Grazhdanskij process: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Civil process: a textbook for universities] / pod red. M. K. Treushnikova ; Mosk. gos. un-t im. M. V. Lomonosova, YUrid. fak., kaf. grazhdanskogo processa. 6-e izd., pererab. Moscow, Gorodec Publ., 2018, 832 p. (in Russian)

11. Gros’ L.A. Proizvodstvo v sudah kassacionnoj instancii - osnovnaya forma proverki zakonnosti sudebnyh aktov, vstupivshih v zakonnuyu silu [Proceedings in the courts of cassation - the main form of verification of the legality of judicial acts that have entered into force] Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process [Arbitration and civil process]. 2012, no. 10, pp. 20-24. (in Russian)

12. Gukasyan R. Problema interesa v sovetskom grazhdanskom processual’nom prave [The problem of interest in the Soviet civil procedural law]. Saratov, Privolzh. kn. izd-vo, 1970. 190 p. (in Russian)

13. Demichev A.A. Pozitivistskaya klassifikaciya principov grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava Rossijskoj Federacii [Positivist classification of the principles of civil procedural law of the Russian Federation] Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process [Arbitration and civil process]. 2005, no. 7, pp. 5-10. (in Russian)

14. Kamenkov V. Novoe o principah hozyajstvennogo processual’nogo prava (ponyatie, znachenie, sostav i sistema principov hozyajstvennogo processual’nogo prava, ih klassifikaciya) [New about the principles of economic procedural law (the concept, meaning, composition and system of principles of economic procedural law, their classification] Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process [Arbitration and civil process]. 2007, no. 6, pp. 40-43. (in Russian)

15. Klabukov I.S. Osobennosti dejstviya principov sostyazatel’nosti i dispozitivnosti s uchastiem organov gosudarstvennoj vlasti i organov mestnogo samoupravleniya na proverochnyh stadiyah grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Peculiarities of operation of the principles of competitiveness and dispositiveness with the participation of public authorities and local governments at the verification stages of civil proceedings] Rossijskij sud’ya [Russian judge]. 2022, no. 4, pp. 23-28. (in Russian)

16. Kotlovskaya Ya.S. Istoricheskoe razvitie nekotoryh principov grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava sovetskogo perioda i sovremennoj Rossii [Historical development of some principles of civil procedural law of the Soviet period and modern Russia] Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process [Arbitration and civil process]. 2006, no. 12, pp. 9-13. (in Russian)

17. Kuras T.L. Voprosy dejstviya principa dispozitivnosti v grazhdanskom processe RF [Questions of the operation of the principle of dispositivity in the civil process of the Russian Federation] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2008, no. 3 (42), pp. 76-79. (in Russian)

18. Moiseev S.V. Princip dispozitivnosti arbitrazhnogo processa (ponyatie i otdel’nye rasporyaditel’nye dejstviya v sude pervoj instancii) [The principle of dispositiveness of the arbitration process (the concept and individual administrative actions in the court of first instance)]. Moscow, Gorodec Publ., 2008, 192 p. (in Russian)

19. Murad’yan E.M. Proverka sudebnyh postanovlenij v socialisticheskom grazhdanskom processe [Verification of judicial decisions in the socialist civil process]. Moscow, 1989, 155 p. (in Russian)

20. Pleshanov A.G. Dispozitivnoe nachalo v sfere grazhdanskoj yurisdikcii: problemy teorii i praktiki [Dispositive beginning in the sphere of civil jurisdiction: problems of theory and practice]. Moscow, NORMA Publ., 2002, 352 p. (in Russian)

21. Praktika primeneniya Arbitrazhnogo processual’nogo kodeksa RF [The practice of applying the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. I.V. Reshetnikova [et al.] ; otv. red. I.V. Reshetnikova. 5-e izd., pererab. i dop. Moscow, Yurajt Publ., 2019, 480 p. (in Russian)

22. Semenov V.M. Principy sovetskogo grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava: Avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [Principles of Soviet civil procedural law. Cand. sci. diss. abstr.]. Sverdlovsk, 1965, 45 p. (in Russian)

23. Skripina S.V. Rol’ apellyacionnogo i kassacionnogo proizvodstva v ispravlenii sudebnyh oshibok [The role of appellate and cassation proceedings in correcting judicial errors] Otechestvennaya yurisprudenciya [Otechestvennaya jurisprudence]. 2017, no. 5, p. 65-68. (in Russian)

24. Taranenko V.F. Principy arbitrazhnogo processa i vliyanie sovetskoj processual’noj teorii na ih formirovanie: Avtoref. dis. …d-ra yurid. nauk [Principles of the arbitration process and the influence of Soviet procedural theory on their formation. Cand. sci. diss. abstr.]. Moscow, 1984, 45 p. (in Russian)

25. Tulinova B. O principah pravosudiya po grazhdanskim i administrativnym delam i o svoeobrazii principa doveriya k sudu i pravosudiyu [On the principles of justice in civil and administrative cases and on the originality of the principle of trust in the court and justice]. ConsultantPlus : Legal reference system. (in Russian)

26. Chechina N.A. Principy sovetskogo grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava [Principles of Soviet civil procedural law] Aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki grazhdanskogo processa [Actual problems of the theory and practice of civil process]. Leningrad, 1979, p. 50-58. (in Russian)

27. Sherstyuk V.M. Sistema sovetskogo grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava (voprosy teorii) [The system of Soviet civil procedural law (questions of theory)]. Moscow, 1989, 133 p. (in Russian)