The article deals with the issue of necessary defense. The conclusion is made about its universal character. Its intersectoral nature is noted. The sign of the public danger of encroachment is analyzed, as a result of which the author comes to the conclusion that the legislator deliberately does not use it in relation to administrative offenses, seeking to differentiate offenses related to criminal law in this way. It is also concluded that the correct approach is applied by the legislator to exclude the sign of public danger from administrative offenses. The peculiarity of administrative offenses and the possibility of using the necessary defense to protect against them are analyzed. The conclusion is made about the possibility of applying the necessary defense against administrative torts and the need to include this institution in the number of circumstances excluding the delinquency of the act.

administrative offense, necessary defense, public danger, circumstances excluding the composition of an administrative offense

Shveyger Aleksandr Olegovich – Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Crim-inology, Far Eastern Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation (15, Kazarmeniy ln., Khabarovsk, 680020, Russian Federation), ORCID: 0000-0002-6200-5427, e-mail: shvejgersasha@mail.ru

Shveyger A. O. Problemy realizacii neobhodimoj oborony ot administrativnyh pravonarushenij [Problems of implementing the necessary defense against administrative offenses] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2022, no 4(99), pp. 29 - 35. DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2022.4.29. (in Russian).

342.92

JHFSQH

1. Garbatovich D.A. Neobkhodimaya oborona ot neprestupnykh poboev [Necessary defense against impregnable beatings]. Rossiiskii sud’ya [Russian judge], 2017, no. 6, pp. 31-33. (in Russian)

2. Istomin A.F. Otvetstvennost’ za ubiistvo pri prevyshenii predelov neobkhodimoi oborony (ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty) [Responsibility for murder in excess of the limits of necessary defense (criminal and criminological aspects) Cand. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 1995, 220 p. (in Russian)

3. Karapetyan A.G. Obshchestvennaya opasnost’ administrativnykh pravonarushenii v byudzhetnoi sfere [Public danger of administrative offenses in the public sector]. Sovremennyi yurist [Modern lawyer], 2019, no. 1, pp. 10-16. (in Russian)

4. Kisin V.R. Sostoyanie i perspektivy pravovogo regulirovaniya obstoyatel’stv, isklyuchayushchikh administrativnuyu deliktnost’ deyaniya [The state and prospects of legal regulation of circumstances excluding the administrative delinquency of an act]. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess [Administrative law and process], 2018, no. 10, pp. 22-26. (in Russian)

5. Kolpakov V.K. Vrednost’ i obshchestvennaya opasnost’ administrativnogo pravonarusheniya. [Harmfulness and social danger of an administrative offense]. Konsul’tantPlyus: spravochnaya pravovaya sistema [ConsultantPlus: reference legal system]. (in Russian)

6. Kononkova N.V., Zalunina T.G. K voprosu o dopustimosti neobkhodimoi oborony pri zashchite ot posyagatel’stva, imeyushchego priznaki administrativnogo pravonarusheniya [On the question of the admissibility of freedom of defense when protecting against encroachment, the importance of an administrative offense]. Vestnik AmGU [Bulletin of the Amur State University], 2018, vol. 82, pp. 32-36. (in Russian)

7. Bormasheva K., Novoselova L., Yankovskii R., Zhuzhzhalov M. Oborot tsifrovykh aktivov v Rossii [Turnover of digital assets in Russia]. Zakon [Law], 2020, no. 12, pp. 17-28. (in Russian)

8. Popugaev Yu.I. Osnovnye kontseptual’nye polozheniya po razrabotke obshchei i osobennoi chastei novogo kodeksa rossiiskoi federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh [The main conceptual provisions for the development of the general and special parts of the new code of the Russian Federation on administrative offenses]. Konsul’tantPlyus: spravochnaya pravovaya sistema [ConsultantPlus: reference legal system]. (in Russian)

9. Rueva E.O. Aktual’nye problemy normotvorcheskoi yuridicheskoi tekhniki na primere KoAP RF [Actual problems of rule-making legal technique on the example of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation]. Konsul’tantPlyus: spravochnaya pravovaya sistema [ConsultantPlus: reference legal system]. (in Russian)

10. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Chasti Obshchaya i Osobennaya: uchebnik [Criminal law of Russia. Parts General and Special: textbook]. Ed. by A.I. Raroga. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2020, 944 p. (in Russian)

11. Tsukanov N.N. K voprosu ob obshchestvennoi opasnosti administrativnogo pravonarusheniya (na osnovanii predlozhenii Yu.P. Solov’ya po modernizatsii kontseptsii administrativnoi otvetstvennosti) [To the question of the public danger of an administrative offense (based on the proposals of Yu.P. Soloviev on the modernization of the concept of administrative responsibility)]. Konsul’tantPlyus: spravochnaya pravovaya sistema [ConsultantPlus: reference legal system]. (in Russian)