Georgievskiy Eduard Viktorovich , Kravtsov Roman Vladimirovich

This paper examines the views of Russian scientists who had a significant impact on the formation of the institution of joint commission of a crime in Russian pre-revolutionary criminal law. At the same time, specific historical and comparative (comparative legal) methods are used to study the legal nature of the institution of joint commission of a crime. The authors come to the conclusion that this institution from the middle of the XIX century. develops much more intensively than before. Theoretical provisions on the joint commission of a crime, which mainly include complicity and implication, are published not only in textbooks and author’s lecture courses, but also in rather detailed monographic studies. The general approach to determining the types of accomplices, forms and types of complicity is beginning to be unified. The first attempts are being made to define the concepts of complicity and implication. In practice, a single terminological apparatus is being formed. At the same time, the difference in approaches to the total volume of the institution of joint commission of a crime is also obvious. Some researchers are trying to expand the concept of joint commission of a crime by including not only complicity, but also other forms, others are trying to cover the maximum possible number of cases of joint commission of a crime with the concept of complicity.

involvement, confluence of several criminals, osprey, conspiracy, gang, main intellectual culprits, accomplices, co-criminality

Georgievskiy Eduard Viktorovich – Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law, Law Institute, Irkutsk State University (1, K. Marx st., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation), ORCID: 0000-0001-8811-937X, RSCI AuthorID: 525295, ResearcerID: ABE-9081-2021, e-mail: georgcrime@yandex.ru

Kravtsov Roman Vladimirovich – Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of thе Department of Criminal Law, Law Institute, Irkutsk State University (1, K. Marx st., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation), ORCID: 0000-0001-5597-269X, RSCI AuthorID: 355169, e-mail: kravtsov.r.v@gmail.com

Georgievsky E. V., Kravtsov R. V. Joint Commitment of a Crime in the Doctrine of Russian criminal law (middle XIX century – 1917). Part 2[Sovmestnoe sovershenie prestupleniya v doktrine russkogo ugolovnogo prava (seredina XIX v. – 1917 g.). CHast' 2] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2023, no 4(103), pp. 72–77. – DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2023.4.72 (in Russian)

343(470)(091)

1. Belogrits-Kotlyarevsky L.S. Uchebnik russkogo ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaya i osobennaya chast [Textbook of Russian criminal law. General and special parts]. Kiev, Petersburg, Kharkov, South Russian Book by F.A. Johanson, 1903, 618 p. (in Russian)

2. Budzinsky S.M. Nachala ugolovnogo prava [The beginning of criminal law]. Warsaw, I. Yavorsky type, 1870, 362 p. (in Russian)

3. Vladimirov L.E. Uchebnik russkogo ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaya chast’ [Textbook of Russian criminal law. The general part]. Kharkov, Publishing house type. Kaplan and Biryukov, 1889, 253 p. (in Russian)

4. Poznyshev S.V. Osnovnye nachala nauki ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaya chast’ ugolovnogo prava [The basic principles of the science of criminal law. The general part of criminal law]. Moscow, A.A. Kartsev, 1912, 653 p. (in Russian)

5. Sergievsky N.D. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo. Posobie k lekciyam. CHast’ obshchaya [Russian criminal law. A manual for lectures. The part is common]. St. Petersburg, M. Stasyulevich’s Type, 1896, 379 p. (in Russian)

6. Spasovich V.D. Uchebnik ugolovnogo prava. [Textbook of criminal law]. Vol. 1, issue 1. St. Petersburg, Tip. I. Ogrizko, 1863, 178 p. (in Russian).

7. Tagantsev N.S. Lekcii po russkomu ugolovnomu pravu. CHast’ obshchaya. Vyp. 2 [Lectures on Russian criminal law. The part is common. Issue 2]. St. Petersburg, State type., 1888, 974 p. (in Russian)

8. Foynitsky I.Ya. Ugolovno-pravovaya doktrina o souchastii [Criminal law doctrine of complicity]. YUridicheskij Vestnik [Legal Bulletin]. Moscow, 1891, vol. 7, book 1 (january), no. 1, pp. 3-28. (in Russian)