A study of individual public legal mechanisms for alternative dispute resolution was carried out. The content of the concept of alternative dispute resolution is revealed, a conclusion is formulated about the need to develop public legal mechanisms for al-ternative dispute resolution as the obligation of the state to ensure adequate protection of rights and legitimate interests in the context of these mechanisms. The content and features of individual public mechanisms for resolving disputes are revealed using the example of adjudication, dispute resolution by the state ombudsman, as well as courts of aksakals and councils of biys. The conclusion is made about the admissibility of the reception of foreign models of public legal mechanisms for alternative dispute resolution through the prism of the established practice of dispute resolution and the use of alternative methods of dispute res-olution, as well as, taking into account ethnic and cultural aspects, the compliance of public legal mechanisms for alternative dis-pute resolution with the values of society and the presence of potential the demand for such procedures among citizens.

accessibility of justice, right to defense, alternative dispute resolution, adjudication, ombudsman, aksakal court, council of biys

Roze Mikhail Andreevich – Postgraduate, Law Institute, Kemerovo State University (6, Krasnaya st., Kemerovo, 650000, Russian Federation), ORCID: 0009-0000-7875-883X, SPIN-code: 5120-2335, RSCI AuthorID: 1162757, e-mail: michael.roze@yandex.ru

Roze M. A. Vnedrenie publichno-pravovyh mekhanizmov al'ternativnogo razresheniya sporov v kontekste obespecheniya dostupnosti pravosudiya [Implementation of public legal mechanisms for alternative dispute resolution in the context of ensuring accessibility to justice] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2024, no 3(106), pp. 93–99. – DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2024.3.93 (in Russian)

342:347

1. Alenkina N.B. Sovmestimost protsedur razresheniya sporov gosudarstvennykh i negosudarstvennykh sudov v Kyrgyzstane: na primere sudov aksakalov [Compatibility of procedures for resolving disputes of state and non-state courts in Kyrgyzstan: using the example of elder courts]. Vestnik Kyrgyzsko-Rossiiskogo Slavyanskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University]. 2016, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 46-53. (in Russian)

2. Alenkina N.B. Sudy aksakalov: legitimatsiya traditsionnykh tsennostei kyrgyzskogo obshchestva [Courts of elders: legitimation of traditional values of Kyrgyz society]. Herald of the Euro-Asian Law Congress, 2019, no. 1 (3), pp. 24-36. (in Russian)

3. Bakirova A.M. Sovet biev kak arkhetip traditsionnoi pravovoi kul’tury kazakhov v XXI v. (iz serii statei pro arkhetipy) [Council of Biys as an ar-chetype of the traditional legal culture of the Kazakhs in the 21st century. (from a series of articles about archetypes)]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosu-darstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki [Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and social sci-ences], 2023, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 231-239. https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2023-7-2-231-239. (in Russian)

4. E.A. Borisova E.A. Alternativnoe razreshenie sporov [Alternative dispute resolution]. Moscow, Gorodets Publ., 2019, 416 p. (in Russian)

5. Butenko R.N. Ad”yudikatsiya kak alternativnyi sposob razresheniya mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh sporov [Adjudication as an alternative method of resolving international commercial disputes]. Cand. sci. diss. Moscow, 2018. 224 p. (in Russian)

6. Butenko R.N. Protsedury ad”yudikatsii i privedenie v ispolnenie prinyatykh reshenii [Adjudication procedures and enforcement of adopted decisions]. Khozyaistvo i parvo [Economy and Law], 2017, no. 5, pp. 116-128. (in Russian)

7. Vavilin E.V. Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav [Implementation and protection of civil rights]. Moscow, Volters Kluver Publ., 2009, 360 p.

8. D’yakonova O.G. Vozmozhnosti ispolzovaniya spetsialnykh znanii v alternativnom razreshenii sporov [Possibilities of using special knowledge in alternative dispute resolution]. Rossiiskii sud’ya [Russian Judge], 2022, no. 8, pp. 3-7. https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3791-2022-8-3-7 (in Rus-sian)

9. Kutarova M.A. Mediatsiya kak alternativnyi sposob razresheniya sporov, voznikayushchikh iz grazhdanskikh pravootnoshenii [Mediation as an alternative way to resolve disputes arising from civil legal relations]. Grazhdanskoe parvo [Civil law], 2023, no. 1, pp. 27-30. https://doi.org/10.18572/2070-2140-2023-1-27-30 (in Russian)

10. Lazarev S.V. “Nezapadnye” alternativnye sposoby uregulirovaniya sporov [“Non-Western” alternative methods of resolving disputes]. Arbi-trazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess [Arbitration and civil process], 2020, no. 2, pp. 37-41. https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383X-2020-2-37-41 (in Rus-sian)

11. Petrukhin M.V., Petrukhina A.N. Institut finansovogo ombudsmena v Rossii i stranakh Evrosoyuza: dovody za i protiv [The Institute of Financial Ombudsman in Russia and the European Union: arguments for and against]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa [Bulletin of Civil Procedure], 2021, no. 1, pp. 208-224. (in Russian)

12. Sander F. O razlichnykh sposobakh rassmotreniya sporov [On various methods of resolving disputes]. Mediatsiya i pravo [Mediation and law], 2016, no. 1 (39), pp. 31-69. (in Russian)

13. Streltsova E.G. Zakonnaya sila sudebnykh postanovlenii i pravovaya sila ARS-soglashenii: dopustima li unifikatsiya? [Legal force of court deci-sions and legal force of ADR agreements: is unification acceptable?] Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa [Bulletin of civil procedure], 2022, no. 4, pp. 153-171. https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2022-12-4-153-171 (in Russian)

14. Trezubov E.S., Kurnosov A.A. Primenenie obespechitelnykh mer v treteiskom razbiratelstve [Application of interim measures in arbitration proceedings]. Rossiiskii sud’ya [Russian Judge], 2022, no. 10, pp. 7-11. https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3791-2022-10-7-11 (in Russian)

15. Yalilov A.D. Alternativnoe uregulirovanie sporov v stroitel’stve: postanovka problemy [Alternative resolution of disputes in construction: problem statement]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa [Bulletin of Civil Procedure], 2022, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 246-274. https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2022-12-5-246-274 (in Russian)

16. Ferran E. Dispute resolution mechanisms in the UK financial sector. SSRN: official website. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=298176# (accessed: 01 December 2023)