The category of “corpus delicti” from the position of normativism is considered. It is pointed out that within the framework of this doctrine law is recognised as an independent matter, and therefore the corpus delicti, as a fundamental category of criminal law, is closely related to the criminal law norm. Within the normativist approach four understandings of the corpus delicti are distinguished: 1) the totality of features; 2) the system of features; 3) the legislator’s notion of a certain type of crime; 4) the legislator’s tool. Content analysis of the definitions of the corpus delicti allowed to identify the advantages and disadvantages of understanding this category from the standpoint of normativism. It is concluded that with all the positive aspects of the normativist approach, there are also significant shortcomings: 1) the corpus delicti, identified with the criminal-legal norm, can not act as a basis for criminal responsibility, since only really existing phenomena in the form of the actual can be criminally punishable; 2) it is impossible to raise the question of guilt, if the corpus delicti is in the legislative matter; 3) the essence of the offence remains unimportant, because the priority is given to the formal act with the signs specified in the law; 4) the corpus delicti is not the basis for criminal liability.

corpus delicti, normativism, tool of the legislator, system of signs, totality of signs, criminal-legal norm

Solovyova Elena Aleksandrovna – Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Deparment of Criminal Law and Prosecutor’s Supervision, Perm State National Research University (15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russian Federation), ORCID: 0000-0003-0076-0811, RSCI Author ID: 806181, e-mail: solovevapsu@yandex.ru

Solovyova E. A. Sostav prestupleniya s pozicij normativizma: kriticheskij vzglyad [The corpus delicti of the offence from the standpoint of normativism: a critical view] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2025, no 1(108), pp. 102–108. – DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2025.1.102 (in Russian)

343.01

1. Akshin M.O. Empiricheskij i teoreticheskij urovni istoriko-pravovogo poznaniya [Empirical and theoretical levels of histotical and legal knowledge] Rossijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal [Russian Law Journal], 2021, no. 2, pp. 43-55. DOI: 10.34076/20713797-2021-2-43 (in Russian)

2. Andreev I.V. Teoretiko-pravovye osnovy kvalifikacii prestuplenij [Theoretical and legal bases of qualification of crimes]. Cand. sci. diss. Tyumen, 2000, 204 p. (in Russian)

3. Aniskina E.G. Problemy disfunkcii ugolovnogo prava i puti ih preodoleniya [Problems of dycfunction of criminal law and ways to overcome them]. Kriminologicheskij zhurnal [Criminological Journal], 2023, no. 4, pp. 35-39. DOI: 10.24412/2687-0185-2023-3-35-39 (in Russian)

4. Borovyh L.V., Solov’eva E.A. Problemy privlecheniya lica k ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti za zanyatie vysshego polozheniya v prestupnoj ierarhii [Problems related to prosecution of a person for occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy] Sudebnaya vlast i ugolovnyj process [Judicial power and criminal process], 2021, no. 2, pp. 74-80. (in Russian)

5. Gauhman L.D. Kvalifikaciya prestuplenij: zakon, teoriya, praktika [Qualification of offences: law, theory, practice]. 2nd ed., revised and supplemented. Moscow, Centr YurInfor Publ., 2003, 316 p. (in Russian)

6. Gerasimov A.M. Teoriya ugolovnogo pravonarusheniya [Theory of criminal offence]. Dr. sci. diss. Saratov, 2022, 428 p. (in Russian)

7. Ershov V.V. Rossijskoe pravo s pozicij legizma i integrativnogo ponimaniya [Russian law from the standpoint of legism and integrative understanding]. Rossijskoe pravosudie [Russian Justice], 2011, no. 10 (66), pp. 5-22 (in Russian)

8. Zvecharovskij I.E. Otvetstvennost v ugolovnom prave [Responsibility in criminal law]. St. Petersburg, Yuridicheskij centr Press, 2009, 100 p. (in Russian)

9. Ivanchin A.V. Konceptualnye osnovy konstruirovaniya sostava prestupleniya [Conceptual bases of constructing the corpus delicti of a crime]. Dr. sci. diss. Yaroslavl, 2014, 462 p. (in Russian)

10. Ilidzhev A.A. Otrazhenie polozhenij Obshchej chasti UK RF o prestuplenii v ego Osobennoj chasti [Reflection of the provisions of the General part of the Criminal Code of the Tussian Federation on the crime in its Particular part: problems of theory and legislative regulation]: problemy teorii i zakonodatelnogo regulirovaniya. Dr. sci. diss. abstr. Rostov-on-Don, 2023, 54 p. (in Russian)

11. Krylova N.E. Diskussionnye voprosy ucheniya o sostave prestupleniya [Discussion issues of the doctrine of the composition of the offence]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11, Pravo [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 11. Law], 2012, no. 4, p. 26-43 (in Russian)

12. Kuznecova N.F. Problemy kvalifikacii prestuplenij: Lekcii po speckursu “Osnovy kvalifikacii prestuplenij” [Problems of qualification of crimes: Lectures on the special course “Fundamentals of qualification of crimes” qualification of crimes]. Moscow, Gorodec Publ., 2007, 332 p. (in Russian)

13. Lopashenko N.A. Razmyshleniya ob ugolovnom prave. Principy ugolovnogo zakonodatel’stva. Ugolovnyj zakon. Prestuplenie, prostupok i sostav prestupleniya [Reflections on criminal law. Principles of criminal legislation. Criminal law. Crime, misdemeanour and corpus delicti offence]. Monografiya. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2020, 440 p. (in Russian)

14. Lyapunov YU. Sostav prestupleniya: gnoseologicheskij i socialno-pravovoj aspekty [The corpus delicti: gnoseological and socio-legal aspects]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law], 2005, no. 5, pp. 44-48. (in Russian)

15. Maslova E.V. Fakultativnye priznaki sub”ektivnoj storony sostava prestupleniya: teoretiko-prikladnoe issledovanie [Optional signs of the subjective side of a crime: Theoretical and applied research]. Cand. sci. diss. abstr. Nizhnij Novgorod, 2017, 37 p. (in Russian)

16. Nikonov V.A. Osnovy teorii kvalifikacii prestuplenij (algoritmicheskij podhod) [Fundamentals of the theory of qualification of crimes (algorithmic approach)]. Textbook. Tyumen, Tyumen St. Univ., 2001, 204 p. (in Russian)

17. Omigov V.I., Isimov S.A. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast. Kurs lekcij [Criminal Law. General part. Course of lectures]. Vol. 1. Perm, 2001, 610 p. (in Russian)

18. Orazdurdyev A.M. Klassifikaciya sostavov prestuplenij v ugolovnom prave [Classification of corpus delicti in criminal law]. Monografiya. Moscow, Norma, INFRA-M Publ., 2023, 408 p. (in Russian)

19. Polyakov S.A. Teoriya sostava prestupleniya [Theory of corpus delicti]: uchebnik. Novosibirsk, NGTU Publ., 2011, 184 p. (in Russian)

20. Predein P.YU. Zakonodatelnye konstrukcii edinichnyh slozhnyh prestuplenij [Legislative constructions of single complex offences]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta [Vestnik of Perm University], 2011, no. 4 (14), pp. 169-179 (in Russian)

21. Pudovochkin YU.E., Dorogin D.A. Uchenie o prestuplenii i o sostave prestupleniya [The doctrine of the offence and the corpus delicti]. Textbook. Moscow, Rossijskij gosudarstvennyj universitet pravosudiya Publ., 2017. 225 p. (in Russian).

22. Sitnikova A.I. Zakonodatelnaya tekstologiya ugolovnogo prava [Legislative textology of criminal Law]. Lex russica, 2017, no. 3, pp. 106-122. DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2017.124.3.106-122 (in Russian)

23. Sobornov P.E. Voprosy pravoponimaniya v sovetskoj yuridicheskoj nauke 1920-h gg. [Issues of legal understanding in Soviet legal dcience in the 1920 s.]. Rossijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal [Russian Law Journal], 2021, no. 3, pp. 163-169. DOI:10.34076/22196838-2021-3-163 (in Russian)

24. Turyshev A.A. Sostav prestupleniya [The corpus delicti]: ucheb. posobie. Omsk, Omsk Acad. MVD Rossii, 2020, 104 p. (in Russian)

25. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. CHasti Obshchaya i Osobennaya [Criminal Law of Russia. Parts General and Particular]. Textbook. 2nd ed., revised and supplemented. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2018, 944 p. (in Russian)

26. Khilyuta V.V. Sostav prestupleniya kak ontologicheskaya realnost nepoznannogo bytiya [Component Elements of a Crime as an Ontological Reality of Unknown Existence]. Lex russica, 202, vol. 73, no. 12, p. 131-144. DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.169.12.131-144 (in Russian)

27. Cherdancev A.F. Logiko-yazykovye fenomeny v yurisprudencii [Logico-linguistic phenomena in jurisprudence]: Monografiya. Moscow, Norma Publ., INFRA-M Publ., 2012. 381 p. (in Russian)

28. Yani P.S. Nekotorye aspekty ponimaniya professorom N.F. Kuznecovoj sostava prestupleniya [Some aspects of understanding by Professor N.F. Kuznetsova of the corpus delicti]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11, Pravo [Vestnik of Moscow University. Series 11, Law], 2017, no. 6, pp. 6-14 (in Russian)