This material is the second part of a single research material on the topic. Within the framework of this part, the features of the implementation of the disaster prevention mechanism at the national level are analyzed, taking into account the international foundations of this area. The author considers preventive activities to protect against disasters, both in the context of the forecast and readiness of the territory, and timely supervisory activities by state bodies. Responsibility for the consequences of disasters, in turn, is a necessary element of a developed state to ensure the protection of its population, which is present in the activities of the state itself and its bodies, business, and society. The article presents the contradictions of theoretical and practical approaches to the formation of such responsibility, and also reflects the author’s opinion on the possibility of applying social responsibility equally with state responsibility.

prevention from disaster, liability for the consequences of disasters, protection from disaster, social responsibility, international law of disaster

Lisauskaite Valentina Vlado – Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Ass. Professor, professor of Criminal law and Criminology Department, East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia (110, Lermontov st., Irkutsk, 664074, Russian Federation); Associate Professor of the Department of International Law, Law Institute, Siberian Federal University (6, Maerchaka st., Krasnoyarsk, 660075, Russian Federation), ORCID: 0000-0003-3694-9966, RSCI Author ID: 525324, e-mail: vlado@mail.ru

Lisauskaite V.V. Osobennosti otvetstvennosti gosudarstva v kontekste preduprezhdeniya bedstvij i ix posledstvij v ramkax ispolneniya mezhdunarodnogo mexanizma zashhity ot bedstvij. Chast' 2 [Features of state responsibility in the context of disaster prevention and their consequences in the framework of implementation of the international mechanism for protection from disaster. Part 2] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2025, no 4 (111), pp. 154–161. – DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2025.4.154 (in Russian).

341+347.51

1. Lisauskajte V.V. K voprosu o primenenii st. 238 UK RF [On the application of Article 238 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation]. Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald], 2008, no. 1 (40), pp. 57-59. (in Russian)

2. SHalagin A.E. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za sokrytie informacii ob obstoyatelstvah, sozdayushchih opasnost dlya zhizni i zdorov’ya lyudej [Criminal liability for concealing information about circumstances that pose a danger to human life and health]. Vestnik Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of the Kazan Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia], 2013, no. 13, pp. 39-44. (in Russian)

3. Alemanno A., Lauta K.C. The L’Aquila Seven Re1establishing justice after a natural disaster. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2014, no. 2. Available at: https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/blog/disaster-liability-SSRN-id2461327.pdf (accessed: 22.06.2025).

4. Alexander D. Communicating earthquake risk to the public: the trial of the “L’Aquila Seven”. Natural Hazards, 2014, vol. 72, pp. 1159-1173.

5. Mclennan B., Eburn M. Exposing hidden-value trade-offs: sharing wildfire management responsibility between government and citizens. International Journal Wildland Fire, 2015, no. 24, pp. 162-169. DOI: 10.1071/WF12201

6. Raikes J., McBean G. Responsibility and liability in emergency management to natural disasters: A Canadian example. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2016, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 12-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.01.004