Fedorov Dmitrii Michailovich

This article is devoted to the scientific and practical problems of writ proceedings, including: the possibility of recovering claims for the provision of services by representatives of housing and communal services; complete absence of statute of limitations; no distinction between the concepts of "debtor", "potential debtor", as well as "debtor who previously acted as a recoverer"; lack of force of an enforcement document for rulings on the cancellation of a court order; the disputable status of the need to pay the state duty when the execution of the court order is reversed by the former debtor, including repeatedly after the trial in the claim proceedings. The study includes a brief retrospective analysis confirming the continuity of writ proceedings in modern Russia since the reforms of Emperor Alexander II, as well as an overview of the issues raised by other authors from 2022 to 2025. In addition, the article provides a list of possible grounds for the cancellation of court orders, as well as explains the principles on which such grounds are approved by magistrates' courts in relation to individuals, according to which any documentary evidence of the subject's non-presence at the place of registration at the time of hypothetical receipt of correspondence restores the period for filing the relevant objections. Particular attention is paid to the types of abuse of civil law in writ proceedings: cancellation of old court orders on dubious grounds; lowering the threshold of the claim for collection. The author characterizes the unreasonableness of the state duty in the reversal of the execution of a court order as a common problem, which is confirmed by the contradictory interpretation of the provision of subparagraph 13 of paragraph 1 of Article 333.19 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation. In conclusion, the author proposes to introduce a simplified procedure for reversing the execution of court orders when filing appropriate objections to old court orders, to exclude the possibility of writ proceedings for the recovery of housing and communal services, as well as to introduce a statute of limitations for initiating writ proceedings of 5 years

court order, order proceedings, uncontested claim, debtor, housing and communal services (HCS), communal services, civil law, financial law, arrears, recovery, enforcement proceedings, Russian civil law

Fedorov Dmitrii Michailovich – Attorney at Law, Vsevolozhsk City Bar Association (78, Pavlovskaya st., Vsevolozhsk, 188643, Russian Federation), ORCID: 0009-0000-7415-3905, RSCI Author ID: 1218196, e-mail: lawyersspb@yahoo.com

Fedorov D.M. Problemy i puti razvitiya prikaznogo proizvodstva v grazhdanskom i administrativnom protsessakh v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Problems and development prospects of order proceedings in civil and administrative procedure in the Russian Federation]. Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2026, no 3 (114), pp. 61–68. – DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2026.3.61 (in Russian).

347.922.3

1. Grebenkin A.S. Tsessiya problemnykh aktivov kak risk nedeystvitel'nosti mediativnogo soglasheniya [Cession of distressed assets as a risk of invalidity of a mediation agreement]. Yuridicheskaya nauka [Legal Science], 2025, no. 11, pp. 426-430. (in Russian)

2. Dvalishvili R.Z. Ustanovleniye fakta shikany v prave Rossii i Germanii [Establishing the fact of chicanery in Russian and German law]. Yurist [Jurist], 2023, no. 6, pp. 44-48. (in Russian)

3. Ignat'yev I.N., Manokhin P.Ye. Vnedreniye sovremennykh tekhnologiy dlya snizheniya ekspluatatsionnykh zatrat mnogokvartirnykh zhilykh domov [Implementation of modern technologies to reduce operating costs of apartment buildings]. Nauchnoye prostranstvo: aktualnyye voprosy, dostizheniya i perspektivy razvitiya [Scientific space: current issues, achievements and development prospects]. Collection of scientific papers based on the materials of the 4th International Scientific and Practical Conference. Anapa, 2022, pp. 79-85. (in Russian)

4. Minasyan G.M. Sudebnyy prikaz kak raznovidnost sudebnogo akta: nekotoryye aktual'nyye voprosy i probely v zakonodatelstve [Court order as a type of judicial act: some current issues and gaps in legislation]. Obrazovaniye i pravo [Education and Law], 2022, no. 3, pp. 219-222. (in Russian)

5. Nagdaliyeva L.S. Istoriya razvitiya uproshchennogo i prikaznogo proizvodstva v rossiyskom arbitrazhnom i grazhdanskom protsesse [History of development of simplified and order proceedings in Russian arbitration and civil process]. Aktualnyye problemy rossiyskogo prava [Actual Problems of Russian Law], 2010, no. 2, pp. 69-81. (in Russian)

6. Pavlova L.N. Prikaznoye proizvodstvo: problematika otsenki besspornosti zayavlennykh trebovaniy [Order proceedings: issues of assessing the indisputability of stated claims]. Aktualnyye problemy rossiyskogo prava [Actual Problems of Russian Law], 2024, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 52-63. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2024.168.11.052-063 (in Russian)

7. Sultanov A.R. Snova o prave obzhalovaniya, ili Problema vozmozhnosti vosstanovleniya srokov dlya podachi vozrazheniy na suдебный приказ [Again on the right to appeal, or the problem of the possibility of restoring the time limit for filing objections to a court order]. Vestnik Gumanitarnogo universiteta [Herald of the Liberal Arts University], 2024, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 128-138. (in Russian)