Mityukova Marina Aleksandrovna, Shishkina Natalia Eduardovna

The lack of sufficient legal regulation of criminal procedural activity at the stage of initiating a criminal case causes the constant appeal of theorists and practitioners to the study of this stage. At the same time, the legislator has not yet made the necessary changes to the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. This study analyzes the methods of verifying reports of a crime, in particular, the problems of proper process fixing of received objects and documents when using such methods of collecting evidence as reclamation and presentation. Based on the analysis of theoretical provisions and investigative practice, problems are posed and conclusions are drawn about the need to fix the possibility of seizure in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation when checking a crime report. The issues of the legal status of participants in the stage of initiating a criminal case at the stage of receiving and registering reports of a crime, during the production of investigative actions are also studied. Conclusions are drawn about the need to make changes to the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation aimed at consolidating the legal status of the applicant, the victim, eyewitnesses and other participants in criminal proceedings.

criminal proceedings, initiation of a criminal case, investigative actions, procedural status

Mityukova Marina Aleksandrovna – Teacher of Department of Judicial Law, Law Institute, Irkutsk State University (1, K. Marx st., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation), ORCID: 0000-0002-1297-3614, e-mail: 682284@gmail.com

Shishkina Natalia Eduardovna – Doctor of Juridical Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Constitutional Law and Theory of Law, Law Institute, Irkutsk State University (1, K. Marx st., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation), ORCID: 0000- 0002-3101-4670, e-mail: shishkina1957@rambler.ru

Mityukova M.A., SHishkina N.A. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela [Problems of legal regulation of the stage of exciting a criminal case] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2021, no 4(95), pp. 116–120.DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2021.4.116. (in Russian).

343.133

QQMRTZ

1. Altunina A.A. Altunina A.A. K voprosu o vyemke v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela [On the issue of seizure at the stage of initiation of a criminal case], Aktual’nye problemy pravotvorchestva i pravoprimenitel’noj deyatel’nosti v Rossijskoj Federacii. Materialy mezhvuzovskoj nauchnoj studencheskoj konferencii, posvyashchennoj 100-letiyu Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Actual problems of lawmaking and law enforce-ment in the Russian Federation. Materials of the interuniversity scientific student conference dedicated to the 100th anniversary of Irkutsk State Uni-versity]. Irkutsk, ISU Publishing House, 2018, pp. 246-249. (in Russian).

2. Karetnikov A., Koretnikov S. Sledstvennye dejstviya kak sposoby proverki soobshcheniya o prestuplenii [Koretnikov S. Investigative actions as methods of verifying a crime report], Zakonnost’ [Legality], 2014, no. 7, pp. 39-43. (in Russian).

3. Lukinov A.S. Zakonnost’ obyska i vyemki do vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela [The legality of the search and seizure before the initiation of a criminal case], Zakonnost’ [Legality], 2020. no. 7. pp. 50. (in Russian).

4. Monarch Yu.V. Dopustimost’ dokazatel’stv v ugolovnom processe [Admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings]. Molodoj uchenyj [Young scientist], 2014, no. 17, pp. 404-406. (in Russian).

5. Nazarov A.D. Sledstvennye i sudebnye oshibki i ugolovno-processual’nyj mekhanizm ih ustraneniya: konceptual’nye osnovy [Investigative and judicial errors and the criminal procedure mechanism for their elimination: conceptual foundations. Cand. sci. diss. abstr.]. Saint-Petersburg, 2017. 745 p. (in Russian).

6. Peryakina M.P. Nekotorye processual’nye voprosy iz”yatiya predmetov i dokumentov do vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela [Some procedural is-sues of the seizure of objects and documents before the initiation of a criminal case]. Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of the East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia], 2014, no. 4 (71), pp. 22-25. (in Russian).

7. Sumin A.A. Nekotorye problemy primeneniya stat’i 144 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii [Some problems of application of Article 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. Advokat [Advocate], 2013, no. 4, pp. 22-25. (in Russian).

8. Khalikov A.N. Sobiranie dokazatel’stv v hode proverki soobshcheniya o prestuplenii [Collecting evidence in the course of checking a crime re-port]. Zakonnost’ [Legality], 2013, no. 12, pp. 52-56. (in Russian).