In the article, the author considers the issues of obtaining forensic information during the inspection of the scene of the incident and the problems arising in this regard. The priority role of forensic experts as part of the investigative task force was noted and recommendations were made regarding the solution of individual problems of the investigative task force during the inspection of the scene. The author notes such an important component of the professional activity of a forensic expert as psychological training and increased motivation. The current directions of forensic research involving a specialist of the Forensic Center to inspect the scene of the incident are outlined. Attention is focused on the elimination of the “human factor” in the activities of the investigative task force.

inspection of the scene, investigator, expert, specialist, criminologist, investigative action, investigative team, collection of evidence

Lyubozhenko Igor Anatolyevich – Teacher of the Department of Criminalistics and Forensic Examinations, Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the DPR named after F.E. Dzerzhinsky (84, B. Khmelnitsky Ave., Donetsk, 283050, Russian Federation), ORCID: 0000-0001-8042-6199, e-mail: l.igor1@rambler.ru

Lyubozhenko I. A. Organizacionno-takticheskie aspekty polucheniya sledovatelem kriminalisticheski znachimoj informacii ot specialista-kriminalista v hode OMP [Organizational and tactical aspects of obtaining criminalistically significant information by an investigator from a forensic specialist during an inspection of the scene] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2022, no 4(99), pp. 107 - 112. DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2022.4.107. (in Russian).

343.985

WLHLBS

1. Bulbacheva A.A. Kriminalisticheskoe obespechenie osmotra mesta proisshestviya : diss… kand. yurid. nauk. [Forensic support for the inspection of the scene. Cand. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2017. 230 p. (in Russian)

2. Vinogradova O.P. Sledstvennye oshibki pri provedenii osmotra mesta proisshestviya i ih preodolenie [Investigative errors during the inspection of the scene and their overcoming]. Izvestiya TulGU. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki [Izvestiya TulGU. Economic and legal sciences]. 2015, no. 4-2, pp. 111-120. (in Russian)

3. Volynsky A.F., Lapin V.O. Ekspertno-kriminalisticheskaya sluzhba MVD Rossii: kogda i pochemu iskazhen vektor ee razvitiya, kak ego ispravit’ [Forensic service of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia: when and why the vector of its development is distorted, how to fix it] Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii. [Proceedings of the Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia]. 2021, no. 1 (57), pp. 142-152. (in Russian)

4. Glazyrin F.V. Psihologiya sledstvennyh dejstvij [Psychology of investigative actions]. Volgograd, 2013, 136 p. (in Russian)

5. Glazyrin F.V. Psihologiya sledstvennyh dejstvij [Psychology of investigative actions]. Moscow, Volgograd, 1983, 120 p. (in Russian)

6. Zvyagin I.S., Zvyagin D.S. O nekotoryh problemah kriminalisticheskogo obespecheniya osmotra mesta proisshestviya [On some problems of forensic support for the inspection of the scene] Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta MVD Rossii. [Bulletin of the Voronezh Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia]. 2021, no. 2, pp. 262-266. (in Russian)

7. Kabart I., Welch G. Sovremennaya praktika osmotra mesta obnaruzheniya trupa [Modern practice of examining the place where a corpse was found]. Moscow, Academy, 2007, 369 p. (in Russian)

8. Kostenko K.A., Kostenko G.Yu. Metodologiya i taktika sledstvennogo osmotra [Methodology and tactics of investigative examination]. Khabarovsk, 2017, 168 p. (in Russian)

9. Luzgin I.I., Patskevich A.P. Aktual’nye problemy sovershenstvovaniya pravovyh osnov tekhniko-kriminalisticheskogo obespecheniya raskrytiya i rassledovaniya prestuplenij [Actual problems of improving the legal foundations of technical and forensic support for the disclosure and investigation of crimes]. Vestnik Polockogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya D. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki [Bulletin of the Polotsk State University. Series D. Economic and legal sciences]. 2010, no. 10, pp. 257-263. (in Russian)

10. Pinchuk L.V. K voprosu o ponyatii mesta proisshestviya [To the question of the concept of the place of occurrence]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. [Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia]. 2018, no. 5, pp. 227-231. (in Russian)

11. Tkach V.Yu. Osmotr mesta proisshestviya kak ob”ekt kriminalisticheskogo issledovaniya [Inspection of the scene as an object of forensic research] Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia]. 2012, no. 4, pp. 130-135. (in Russian)

12. Travkin E.A. Vzaimodejstvie sledovatelya so specialistom: problemy organizacii [Interaction between an investigator and a specialist: organizational problems]. Izvestiya TulGU. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki [News of TulGU. Economic and legal sciences]. 2010, no. 2, pp. 400-405. (in Russian)

13. Chernysheva E.V. Effektivnost’ psihologicheskih taktik vzaimodejstviya s doprashivaemym licom pri rassledovanii prestupleniya [The effectiveness of psychological tactics of interaction with the interrogated person in the investigation of a crime] Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psihologiya [Applied Legal Psychology]. 2018, no. 4, pp. 71-81. (in Russian)