It has been revealed that a legal defect acts as an anti-value or destruction of legal reality. Some theoretical and legal aspects of the study of defects in the field of law via the prism of industry affiliation are presented, including the defects of various industry-specific legal institutions, legal implementation and enforcement. The work focuses on the theoretical and methodological study of the problems of legal defects in the legal and technical sphere in the field of the theory of state and law. Attention is paid to the relationship between the theoretical-legal and sectoral nature of the concept of “defect of law” and the legal category of “defense”. The theoretical and legal significance of doctrines in the field of defects of law is revealed, which is expressed in the methodological depth of knowledge of the social and legal nature of the concept of “defects in law”. It is concluded that defects in the law are negative phenomena of legal and state reality, but despite the nature and affiliation of the defect of law, it violates and sometimes complicates the normal, stable process of legal regulation of legal relations. It has been established that the unstable process of legal regulation gives rise to negative and impossible processes for the protection of human and civil rights and freedoms or the need for excessive legal actions aimed at restoring violated rights and freedoms, which in turn allows us to draw a conclusion about the relationship of legal defects to the legal category of “defense”. It is concluded that the legal category of “defense” is the highest legal value in the “person-society-state” legal model. The quintessential significance of the legal category of “defense” is predetermined by the threats and challenges of global change. Therefore, it is recommended to rethink the legal category “defense” in the categorical apparatus of jurisprudence.

defense, legal category, legal construction, state, law, person, society, legal defect

Galiev Mikhail Sergeevich – Candidate of Juridical Science, Associate Professor of the Department of Jurisprudence, Russian Foreign Trade Academy Far East Branch of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation (25, Vilyuyskaya st., Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, 683003, Russian Federation), ORCID: 0000-0001-8686-8756, RSCI AuthorID: 656181, e-mail: galiev87@inbox.ru

Galiev M. S. The Teaching about Defects in the Field of Law and its Relationship to the Legal Category of “Defense” [ Uchenie o defektah v oblasti prava i ego otnoshenie k pravovoj kategorii «zashchita»] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2023, no 4(103), pp. 3–7. – DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2023.4.3 (in Russian)

340

1. Belokon’ N.V. Yazykovye oshibki i defekty v normativnykh pravovykh aktakh, proektakh normativnykh pravovykh aktov i inykh yuridicheskikh dokumentakh [Language errors and defects in normative legal acts, draft normative legal acts and other legal document]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Voronezh State University], 2016, no. 4, pp. 104-114. (in Russian)

2. Vikulin A.Yu. Nachala teorii zakonodatel’nykh defektov [The beginnings of the theory of legislative defects]. Monograph. Moscow, Norma, 2019. 344 p. (in Russian)

3. Devitsky E.I. Bazovye defekty kak osnova vyyavleniya kontseptual’nykh nedostatkov normativnykh pravovykh aktov [Basic defects as the basis for identifying conceptual shortcomings of normative legal acts]. Prolog: zhurnal o prave [Prologue: Journal of Law], 2018, no. 4, pp. 2-9. (in Russian)

4. Vygotsky L.S. Istoricheskii smysl psikhologicheskogo krizisa. Metodologicheskoe issledovanie [Historical meaning of psychological crisis. Methodological research]. Sobranie sochinenii: V 6 t. T. 1. Voprosy teorii i istorii psikhologii [Collected works: In 6 vol. Vol. 1. Questions of the theory and history of psychology]. Ed. A.R. Luria, M.G. Yaroshevsky. Moscow, Pedagogika, 1982, pp. 291-458. (in Russian)

5. Galiev M.S. K voprosu o yuridicheskom defekte kak sotsial’no-pravovoi patologii v razrabotke kontseptsii defektov pravovoi kategorii «zashchita» (teoretiko-metodologicheskii aspekt) [On the issue of a legal defect as a social legal pathology in the development of the concept of defects in the legal category of “defense” (theoretical and methodological aspect)]. Yuridicheskaya nauka [Legal Science], 2023, no. 9, pp. 10-12. (in Russian)

6. Zhil’tsov M.A. Defekty trudovogo prava i sposoby ikh preodoleniya [Labor law defects and ways to overcome them]. Dr. sci. diss. Ekaterinburg, Ural State Law Academy, 2011, 459 p. (in Russian)

7. Zhil’tsov M.A. Defekty trudovogo prava [Defects of labor law]. Monograph. Ekaterinburg, Izd-vo UGTU-UPI, 2010, 312 p. (in Russian)

8. Zhil’tsov M.A. Strukturnye defekty trudovogo prava [Structural defects of labor law]. Lex Russica, 2011, no. 4, pp. 668-676. (in Russian)

9. Zhil’tsov M.A. Uchenie o defektakh v trudovom prave [The doctrine of defects in labor law]. Voprosy upravleniya [Management Issues], 2012, no. 3 (20), pp. 152-162. (in Russian)

10. Isakov V.B. Yuridicheskie fakty v sovetskom prave [Legal facts in Soviet law]. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1984, 144 p. (in Russian)

11. Klimova A.S. Sushchnost’ i tipologiya defektov pravovogo regulirovaniya obshchestvennykh otnoshenii [Essence and typology of defects in the legal regulation of public relations]. Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. P.G. Demidova. Seriya «Gumanitarnye nauki» [Bulletin of the Yaroslavl State University. P.G. Demidova. Series “Humanities”], 2020, no. 2 (25), pp. 72-77. (in Russian)

12. Kozhokar’ I.P. Aksiologicheskie defekty normativnoi podsistemy mekhanizma grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya [Axiological defects of the normative subsystem of the mechanism of civil regulation]. Vlast’ zakona [The Power of Law], 2017, no. 3 (31), pp. 69-92. (in Russian)

13. Kozhokar’ I.P. Defekty normativno-pravovogo regulirovaniya [Defects in legal regulation]. Moscow, Prospekt, 2019, 296 p. (in Russian)

14. Kozhokar’ I.P. Doktrinal’nye podkhody k opredeleniyu ponyatiya pravovogo defekta [Doctrinal approaches to defining the concept of a legal defect]. Pravo i ekonomika [Law and Economics], 2019, no. 1 (371), pp. 5-10. (in Russian)

15. Kozhokar’ I.P. Problemy defektnosti mekhanizma grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya veshchnykh otnoshenii [Problems of defectiveness of the mechanism of civil law regulation of property relations]. Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil law], 2016, no. 3, pp. 44-46. (in Russian)

16. Kutafin O.E. Probely, analogiya i defekty v konstitutsionnom prave [Gaps, analogies and defects in constitutional law]. Lex Russica, 2007, no. 4, pp. 610-622. (in Russian)

17. Polyakov S.B. Defekty zakonodatel’stva i pravoprimenitel’noi praktiki kak predmet yuridicheskoi nauki [Defects in legislation and law enforcement practice as a subject of legal science]. Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal [Russian Legal Journal], 2017, no. 1 (112), pp. 16-22. (in Russian)

18. Puchkov V.O. Tsivilisticheskaya doktrina tsifrovoi epokhi: metodologicheskie, teoreticheskie i prikladnye problemy [Civilistic doctrine of the digital era: methodological, theoretical and applied problems]. Ed. Belykh V.S. Moscow, Prospekt, 2020, 272 p. (in Russian)

19. Sibgatullina G.R. Ponyatiya «defekt prava» i «yuridicheskaya oshibka» v sovremennoi yuridicheskoi nauke [The concepts of “defect of law” and “legal error” in modern legal science]. Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii [Bulletin of Economics, Law and Sociology], 2012, no. 1, pp. 221-224. (in Russian)

20. Sokolova M.A. Vyyavlenie i ustranenie defektov normativnykh pravovykh aktov v mekhanizme pravotvorchestva [Identification and elimination of defects in normative legal acts in the law-making mechanism]. Cand. sci. diss. Moscow, Kutafin Moscow State Law University, 2018, 192 p. (in Russian)

21. Tsybulyak S.I. Defekty konstitutsionno-pravovogo regulirovaniya izbiratel’nykh otnoshenii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Defects in the constitutional and legal regulation of electoral relations in the Russian Federation]. Cand. sci. diss. Tyumen, University of Tyumen, 2010, 269 p. (in Russian)

22. Huhn W.R. Teaching Legal Analysis Using a Pluralistic Model of Law (January 1, 2001). Gonzaga Law Review, vol. 36, 2001, pp. 433-495, Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1704017 (accessed: 01.11.2023). (in English)