SIBERIAN LAW HERALD
ISSN 2071-8136 (print)
ISSN 2071-8144 (online)

List of issues > Siberian Law Herald 2024. 1

Received on 19.12.2023; approved on 15.01.2024; accepted for publication on 09.02.2024


Excess of power by a private detective or employee of a private security organization, completed with the use of weapons or special means and resulting in serious consequences: qualification issues

Author(s)
Fedorova Elena Leonidovna
Abstract
Based on scientific material and law enforcement practice, the issues of qualification of abuse of power by a private detective or an employee of a private security organization holding a private security guard certificate in the performance of their official duties, committed with the use of weapons or special means and resulting in grave consequences, are analyzed. It is stated that quite often in practice this crime has a group nature. Suggestions are made related to editing the existing provisions of Art. 203 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, as well as the addition of new provisions. In particular, it is proposed to partially specify the content of the concept of grave consequences in relation to Part 2 of Art. 203 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and also further consolidate such a qualifying feature as the commission of this crime by a group of persons and an organized group, by formulating a new part 3 of Art. 203 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
Keywords
official crimes, official powers, buse of authority, private security guard, private detective, grave consequences, weapons, special means
About the Authors
Fedorova Elena Leonidovna – Assistant, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law, Chuvash State University named after I. N. Ulyanova (15, Moskovsky ave., Cheboksary, 428015, Russian Federation), ORCID: 0009-0002-5197-9346, RSCI AutorID: 1068419, e-mail: lenleon25@yandex.ru
For citation
Fedorova E. L. Excess of power by a private detective or employee of a private security organization, completed with the use of weapons or special means and resulting in serious consequences: qualification issues[Prevyshenie polnomochij chastnym detektivom ili rabotnikom chastnoj ohrannoj organizacii, sovershennoe s ispol'zovaniem oruzhiya ili special'nyh sredstv i povlekshee tyazhkie posledstviya: voprosy kvalifikacii] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2024, no 1(104), pp. 95–101. – DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2024.1.95 (in Russian)
UDC
343.3
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26516/2071-8136.2024.1.95
References
1. Shestakov V.I. Voprosy teorii, praktiki i pravovogo regulirovaniya negosudarstvennoj sfery bezopasnosti, chastnoj ohrany i syska [Issues of theory, practice and legal regulation of the non-state sphere of security, private security and investigation]. Moscow, RadioSoft Publ., 2021, 336 p. (in Russian)

2. Galahova A.V. Prevyshenie vlasti ili sluzhebnyh polnomochij. Voprosy ugolovno-pravovoj kvalifikacii [Abuse of power or official authority. Issues of criminal legal qualifications]. Moscow, Yurid. lit. Publ. 1978, 96 p. (in Russian)

3. Dineka V.I. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za prevyshenie vlasti ili sluzhebnyh polnomochij sotrudnikov organov vnutrennih del [Criminal liability for abuse of power or official powers of employees of internal affairs bodies]. Cand. sci. diss. Moscow, 1992, 208 p. (in Russian)

4. Zakomoldin R.V., Kondratyuk S.V. Kriterii vybora obstoyatelstv, ispolzuemyh v kachestve kvalificiruyushih priznakov [Criteria for selecting circumstances used as qualifying criteria]. Humanitarni Balkanski izsledvaniya [Humanitarian Balkan Studies], 2019, vol. 3, no. 3(5), pp. 116-120. (in Russian)

5. Zakomoldin R.V. Tyazhkie posledstviya kak priznak sostavov prestuplenij protiv voennoj sluzhby [Grave consequences as a sign of crimes against military service]. Vestnik yuridicheskogo fakulteta [Law Faculty Bulletin]. Sb. sci. art. Samara, Samara gumanit. akad. Publ., 2004, vol. 3, pp. 67-77. (in Russian)

6. Zakomoldin R.V. Sluzhebnye prestupleniya [White-collar crimes]. Samara, Samara gumanit. akad. Publ., 2013, 162 p. (in Russian)

7. Kuznecov A.P., Izosimov S.V. Otvetstvennost za prevyshenie polnomochij sluzhashimi chastnyh ohrannyh ili detektivnyh sluzhb [Responsibility for abuse of authority by employees of private security or detective services]. Yurist [Lawyer], 2000, no. 11, pp. 58-64. (in Russian)

8. Melnikov V.V. Pravosubektnost yuridicheskih lic s osobymi ustavnymi zadachami [Legal personality of legal entities with special statutory tasks]. Rossijskij sudya [Russian judge], 2010, no. 4, pp. 5-9. (in Russian)

9. Shestakov V.I. Ohranalogiya – novaya nauka o professionalnoj ohrannoj deyatelnosti: pervoe znakomstvo [Security analogy – a new science about professional security activities: first acquaintance]. Pravoporyadok: istoriya, teoriya, praktika [Law and order: history, theory, practice], 2023, no. 3, pp. 57-67. (in Russian)


Full text (russian)