SIBERIAN LAW HERALD
ISSN 2071-8136 (print)
ISSN 2071-8144 (online)

List of issues > Siberian Law Herald 2024. 2

Received on 11.02.2024; approved on 26.02.2024; accepted for publication on 08.05.2024.


Pulturality of persons committing a crime in the classical concept of the professor P. I. A. Feuerbach

Author(s)
Georgievskiy Eduard Viktorovich Kravtsov Roman Vladimirovich
Abstract
This article examines the criminal legal views of one of the founders of the classical school of criminal law, Paul Johann Anselm Feuerbach, on the institution of joint commission of a crime. The ideas of Professor Feuerbach formed the basis of the Russian classical school of criminal law, predetermining for many years the approaches of Russian researchers to the issues of criminal liability, imputation, corpus delicti, goals and objectives of punishment, and, accordingly, to the institution of joint commission of a crime, as one of the most complex, contradictory and confusing. The different way in which the reasons or motives of an active criminal are linked allows us to consider him either an amateur culprit, an amateur culprit, or an indirect culprit (assistant). And if active causes give rise to the main culprits and main assistants, then secondary causes, understood today as necessary conditions, contribute to the identification of ordinary assistants in the commission of a crime. In general, P. I. A. Feuerbach calls the participation of several persons in the commission of the same crime complicity or copulation of criminals. At the same time, the author identifies, practically in a modern interpretation, simple and complex complicity, which involves the joint activity of co-performers, in the first case, and performers and other complex figures of complicity, in the second. P. I. A. Feuerbach also highlights the involvement in crime, which he calls favor. The authors believe that the researcher took a comprehensive and systematic approach to the issues of joint crime, defining and formulating basic provisions in the general part of his main work, and individual types in the special part.
Keywords
P. I. A. Feuerbach, plurality of persons, joint commission of a crime, intentional culprit, assistant, complicity, classical school of criminal law
About the Authors
Georgievskiy Eduard Viktorovich – Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law, Law Institute, Irkutsk State University (1, K. Marx st., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation), ORCID: 0000-0001-8811-937X, RSCI AuthorID: 525295, ResearcerID: ABE-9081-2021, e-mail: georgcrime@yandex.ru

Kravtsov Roman Vladimirovich – Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of thе Department of Criminal Law, Law Institute, Irkutsk State University (1, K. Marx st., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation), ORCID: 0000-0001-5597-269X, RSCI AuthorID: 355169, e-mail: kravtsov.r.v@gmail.com
For citation
Georgievskiy E. D., Kravtsov R. V. Mnozhestvennost' lic, sovershayushchih prestuplenie, v klassicheskoj koncepcii professora P. I. A. Fejerbaha [Pulturality of persons committing a crime in the classical concept of the professor P. I. A. Feuerbach] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2024, no 2(105), pp. 3–9. – DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2024.2.3 (in Russian)
UDC
343(470)(091)
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26516/2071-8136.2024.2.3
References
1. Aleksandrova N.S., Barankov N.V. Ugolovno-pravovaya ocenka posredstvennogo ispolneniya prestupleniya v zarubezhnom ugolovnom prave [Criminal legal assessment of mediocre execution of a crime in foreign criminal law] Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo imeni V. B. Bobkova filiala Rossijskoj tamozhennoj akademii [Scientific notes of the Saint Petersburg branch named after V.B. Bobkov of the Russian Customs Academy], 2001, no. 4 (17), pp. 146-155. (in Russian)

2. Baumshtein A-B. Klassicheskaya shkola ugolovnogo prava: etapy istoricheskogo razvitiya [Classical school of criminal law: stages of historical development] Zakon i pravo [Law and Law], 2013, no. 12, pp. 69-70. (in Russian)

3. Bolshaya sovetskaya enciklopediya [Great Soviet Encyclopedia: Chapter]. ed. A.M. Prokhorov. Vol. 27: Ulyanovsk – Frankfort. Moscow, Soviet Encyclopedia, 1977. 624 p. (in Russian)

4. Gertsenzon A.A. Problema zakonnosti i pravosudiya vo francuzskih politicheskih ucheniyah XVIII veka [The problem of legality and justice in French political doctrines of the 18th century]. Moscow, Publishing House Acad. Sciences of the USSR, 1962, 320 p. (in Russian)

5. Isaev M.M. K voprosu o politicheskoj ocenke idej klassicheskoj shkoly ugolovnogo prava v pervoj polovine XIX veka [On the question of the political assessment of the ideas of the classical school of criminal law in the first half of the 19th century]: a report made at the Military Law Academy in April 1946. Moscow, Printing house of the Military Law Academy, 1947, 36 p. (in Russian)

6. Kovalev M.I. Souchastie v prestuplenii. CHast 1. Ponyatie souchastiya [Complicity in crime. Part 1. The concept of complicity]. Sverdlovsk, 1960, 286 p. (in Russian)

7. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava. CHast obshchaya [Course of Soviet criminal law: Crime. General part]. In 6 vols. Vol. 2. Editorial team: Piontkovsky A.A., et al. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1970, 516 p. (in Russian)

8. Osherovich B.S. CHezare Bekkaria [Cesare Beccaria]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo [Soviet State], 1938, no. 4, pp. 93-102. (in Russian)

9. Piontkovsky A.A. Ugolovno-pravovye vozzreniya Kanta, A. Fejerbaha i Fihte [Criminal legal views of Kant, A. Feuerbach and Fichte]. Moscow, Legal publishing house of the People’s Commissariat of Justice of the USSR, 1940, 191 p. (in Russian)

10. Reshetnikov F.M. Ugolovnoe pravo burzhuaznyh stran. Vyp. 1. Prosvetitelno-gumanisticheskoe napravlenie v ugolovnom prave [Criminal law of bourgeois countries. Iss. 1. Educational and humanistic direction in criminal law]. Moscow, Publishing House of the Peoples’ Friendship University named after. Patrice Lumuba, 1965, 70 p. (in Russian)

11. Trainin A.N. Uchenie o souchastii [The doctrine of complicity]. Moscow: Legal publishing house of the People’s Commissariat of Justice of the USSR, 1941, 158 p. (in Russian)

12. Feuerbach P.I.A. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal law]. Saint Petersburg, In medical printing house, 1810, 329 p. (in Russian)

13. Feuerbach P.I.A. Ugolovnoe pravo. Kniga vtoraya, soderzhashchaya polozhitelnuyu ili osobennuyu chast’ ugolovnogo prava: s prilozheniem rossijskih ugolovnyh zakonov, k kazhdomu prestupleniyu porozn otnosyashchihsya [Criminal law. Book two, containing the positive or special part of criminal law: with the application of Russian criminal laws, separately related to each crime]. Saint Petersburg, Type State Commerce Collegium Publ., 1811, 330 p. (in Russian)

14. Feldshtein G.S. Feldshtejn G.S. Glavnye techeniya v istorii nauki ugolovnogo prava v Rossii [Main trends in the history of the science of criminal law in Russia]. Ed. and with a preface V. A. Tomsinova. Moscow, Zertsalo Publ., 2003, 542 p. (in Russian)

15. Shiryaev A.Yu. Uchenie o sostave prestupleniya v pragmaticheskoj koncepcii ugolovnogo prava P.A. Fejerbaha [The doctrine of the composition of a crime in the pragmatic concept of criminal law by P.A. Feuerbach]. Rossijskoe pravo: obrazovanie, praktika, nauka [Russian law: education, practice, science], 2022, no. 6, pp. 53-61. (in Russian)

16. Enciklopedicheskij slovar [Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Vol. 35. Usinsk border district – Fenol]. Ed. by I.E. Andreevsky. Saint Petersburg, Brockhaus-Efron Printing House, 1902, 491 p. (in Russian).

Full text (russian)