The analysis of the problems of legislative and practical penalization is carried out using the example of the construction of sanctions for the main and qualified elements of a crime provided for in Article 200.5 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, as well as a comparative analysis of sanctions for related elements of crimes provided for in Articles 204 and 290, Articles 291 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. It is concluded that the practical penalization of bribery of special subjects provided for in Article 200.5 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation indicates that the courts sometimes impose unjustifiably lenient punishments. There is a discrepancy between the sanctions of the main, qualified corpus delicti, as well as the sanctions of related crimes. The article substantiates the need to establish in all sanctions the parts of Article 200.5 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation additional punishment in the form of deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities. The author’s project of constructing the sanction of art. 200.5 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is proposed.

punishment, bribery, procurement for state and municipal needs, the principle of justice of punishment, penalization, types of punishment

Ignatieva Natalya Vladimirovna – Associate 4 Years of Correspondence Studies, East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia (110, Lermontov st., Irkutsk, 664074, Russian Federation), ORCID: 0000-0002-3711-8147, RSCI Author ID: 53956592, e-mail: ignatiewa.natalya2013@yandex.ru

Ignatieva N. V. Problemy naznacheniya nakazaniya za podkup rabotnika kontraktnoj sluzhby, kontraktnogo upravlyayushchego, chlena komissii po osushchestvleniyu zakupok [Problems of sentencing for bribery of a contract service employee, a contract manager, a member of the procurement commission] Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik [Siberian Law Herald]. 2025, no 2(109), pp. 72–81. – DOI 10.26516/2071-8136.2025.2.72 (in Russian)

343.3/.7

1. Amosova A.A. Poluchenie vzyatki: problemy differentsiatsii ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti i penalizatsii [Receiving a bribe: problems of differentiation of criminal liability and penalization]. Cand. sci. diss. Krasnodar, 2022, 216 p. (in Russian)

2. Antonov I.M. Penalizatsiya prestuplenii, prichinyayushchikh vred zdorov’yu [Penalization of crimes causing harm to health]. Cand. sci. diss. abstr. Vladivostok, 2004, 30 p. (in Russian)

3. Goreglyad O. Opyt nachertaniya Rossiiskogo ugolovnogo prava. Ch. 1. O prestupleniyakh i nakazaniyakh voobshche [The experience of the outline of Russian criminal law. Part 1. On crimes and punishments in general]. Op. Osipa Goreglyada. St. Petersburg, Printing house Ios. Ioannesova, 1815, 168 p. (in Russian)

4. Kunitsyn A. Ehntsiklopediya prav. Izbrannye sotsial’no-politicheskie i filosofskie proizvedeniya dekabristov [Encyclopedia of Rights. Selected socio-political and philosophical works of the Decembrists]. Moscow, 1951, vol. 1, 622 p. (in Russian)

5. Korobeev A.I. Sovetskaya ugolovno-pravovaya politika: problemy kriminalizatsii i penalizatsii [Soviet criminal law policy: problems of criminalization and penalization]. Vladivostok, 1987, 137 p. (in Russian)

6. Lopashenko N.A. Ugolovnaya politika [Criminal policy]. Moscow, 2009, 579 p. (in Russian)

7. Markova-Murashova S.A. Sravnitelno-pravovoi aspekt nakazaniya kak yuridicheskoi kategorii i instituta ugolovnogo prava [Comparative legal aspect of punishment as a legal category and institute of criminal law]. Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ehkonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki [Proceedings of Tula State University. Economic and Legal Sciences], 2012, no. 1-2, pp. 112-118. (in Russian)

8. Naumov A.V. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast. Kurs lektsii [Criminal law. The general part. A course of lectures]. Moscow, 1996, 358 p. (in Russian)

9. Pobegaylo E. F. Kontseptsiya borby s prestupnost’yu i problemy sovershenstvovaniya Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii [The Criminal Code is not a problem of improving the fight against the Russian Federation’s concept of crime]. Pyat’ let deistviya UK RF: itogi i perspektivy: Materialy 11 Mezhdunar. nauch. prakt. konf. (MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova 30 - 31 maya 2002 g.) [Five of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: not results prospects: International 11 material. learn. practice. conf. (Lomonosov Moscow State University May 30-31, 2002)]. Ed. board: G.N. Borzenkov et al. Moscow, 2003, pp. 57-62. (in Russian)

10. Rogova E. V. Avtoreferat Uchenie o differentsiatsii ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti [Abstract. The doctrine of differentiation of criminal responsibility]. Moscow, 2014, 55 p. (in Russian)

11. Rogova E. V., Zabavko R. A. Mnimoe i realnoe uzhestochenie ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za posrednichestvo vo vzyatochnichestve [Apparent and Real Strengthening of Criminal Liability for Mediation in Bribery]. Aktual’nye problemy ekonomiki i prava [Actual Problems of Economics and Law], 2015, no. 4, pp. 76-83. (in Russian)

12. Solntsev G. Rossiiskoe ugolovnoe pravo [Russian criminal law]. Yaroslavl, 1907, 104 p. (in Russian)

13. Tagantsev N. S. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo. Lektsii. Chast’ obshchaya [Russian criminal law. Lectures. The general part]. In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow, 1994, 393 p. (in Russian)

14. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava [The course of Soviet criminal law]. Eds. N.A. Belyaev, M.D. Shargorodsky. Leningrad, 1970, vol. 2, 671 p. (in Russian)

15. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava [The course of Soviet criminal law]. Eds. board A.A. Piontkovsky, P.S. Romashkin, V.M. Chkhikvadze. Moscow, 1970, vol. 3, 350 p. (in Russian)

16. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast [Criminal law. General part]. Eds. board I.Ya. Kozachenko, Z.A. Neznamova. Moscow, 1997, 503 p. (in Russian)